I can't speak for z_smith, but I assume he/she is

I can't speak for z_smith, but I assume he/she is referring to slide #52 from the Dec 7th presentation where it shows SAEs on the right-side of the slide. IMO, this slide is confusing and it caught my attention as I was flipping through the slides at the beginning of the call and almost spit out my coffee. It shows a total of 14 SAEs (n=14) and says 13 of the 14 were related to disease progression, and not the treatment. The 14th one (n=1) shows "SAE related to treatment". But it also shows "SAE related to LL n=0". As I recall, and please correct me if I'm wrong, I think they said the n=1 SAE was in a patient that was in very poor condition, but again I could be wrong.

Quote:

---

I don't recall that one SAE.

---

My comments are just my opinions and should NOT be taken as investment advice.