DEFINITELY ***NOT*** GOING BACK TO THE MOON WE’R
Post# of 123387
(Total Views: 313)
Posted On: 12/14/2022 7:08:17 AM
DEFINITELY ***NOT*** GOING BACK TO THE MOON WE’RE DEFINITELY ***NOT*** GOING BACK TO THE MOON On Tuesday.
At 23 minutes you see the half scale shell/model splashdown....the Splash is too insubstantial and fast for a multi ton"spacecraft" of full scale. The piddling effect should have looked like a fairly smooth white curtain of water that took several seconds to subside.
And the Parachutes look way too small compared to Apollo's whose capsule weighted less than half of Artemis . They used remastered, but still faded old footage of a real re-entry for the through window shots.....probably 60's era.
They tried to match the parachutes red and white pattern with the ones in the splashdown shot at the end of the video...but at 21:25 you see all three parachutes have a solid thin dark ring around halfway from center to circumference. At 23:30...watch the parachutes collapse.....all three have a white ring...not a dark ring there. An embarrassment.
Artemis I Mission Highlights
At 23 minutes you see the half scale shell/model splashdown....the Splash is too insubstantial and fast for a multi ton"spacecraft" of full scale. The piddling effect should have looked like a fairly smooth white curtain of water that took several seconds to subside.
And the Parachutes look way too small compared to Apollo's whose capsule weighted less than half of Artemis . They used remastered, but still faded old footage of a real re-entry for the through window shots.....probably 60's era.
They tried to match the parachutes red and white pattern with the ones in the splashdown shot at the end of the video...but at 21:25 you see all three parachutes have a solid thin dark ring around halfway from center to circumference. At 23:30...watch the parachutes collapse.....all three have a white ring...not a dark ring there. An embarrassment.
Artemis I Mission Highlights
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼