Let's assume that Leronlimab only worked on 20% of
Post# of 155533
(Total Views: 566)
Posted On: 11/30/2022 11:12:18 PM
Let's assume that Leronlimab only worked on 20% of critical Covid so it would only save 200,000 lives.
With 30% it would be 300,000 lives.
With 40% it would be 400,000 lives.
With 50% it would be 500,000 lives.
So a not so good medication with 50% efficacy would only save a half a million lives. What kind of system would block such potential from even being explored? What kind of people would take pride in stopping Leronlimab? Something in humanity is broken.
We can do this folks, keep plugging. We must do this. mTNBC, NASH
With 30% it would be 300,000 lives.
With 40% it would be 400,000 lives.
With 50% it would be 500,000 lives.
So a not so good medication with 50% efficacy would only save a half a million lives. What kind of system would block such potential from even being explored? What kind of people would take pride in stopping Leronlimab? Something in humanity is broken.
We can do this folks, keep plugging. We must do this. mTNBC, NASH
(10)
(0)