Marc S says about Craig: “Can't understand wh
Post# of 154118
(Total Views: 530)
Posted On: 11/01/2022 8:39:46 PM
Marc S says about Craig:
“Can't understand why you keep pounding this issue without apparently providing a single bit of evidence that there is a liquidated damages clause somewhere.”
Oh, I can explain that for you.
It’s because all he does…ALL. HE. DOES…is post contrary bullshit that anyone with five minutes and access to google could refute. Maybe he has some shares, maybe he doesn’t. Hard to know for sure. But one thing I actually am sure of, is he has far more access to post here than he deserves. Nobody should engage him, let alone believe anything he posts. In a just world he gets banned a long time ago. This “I’m just asking questions” or “just pointing out a different view” or “just completely mangling basic law despite supposedly being a real lawyer” schtick is fucking old.
And it’s not just Craig, but a strong handful of disingenuous posters. Somehow though, Craig gets a bunch of people to constantly engage him.
He’s the adult who says “supposably”. The human being who calls it ValentiMes Day. The asshole who would never play craps if he couldn’t bet against the shooter.
I guess what I’m saying is I’m impressed with the price improvement today and the somewhat minimal damage done yesterday.
“Can't understand why you keep pounding this issue without apparently providing a single bit of evidence that there is a liquidated damages clause somewhere.”
Oh, I can explain that for you.
It’s because all he does…ALL. HE. DOES…is post contrary bullshit that anyone with five minutes and access to google could refute. Maybe he has some shares, maybe he doesn’t. Hard to know for sure. But one thing I actually am sure of, is he has far more access to post here than he deserves. Nobody should engage him, let alone believe anything he posts. In a just world he gets banned a long time ago. This “I’m just asking questions” or “just pointing out a different view” or “just completely mangling basic law despite supposedly being a real lawyer” schtick is fucking old.
And it’s not just Craig, but a strong handful of disingenuous posters. Somehow though, Craig gets a bunch of people to constantly engage him.
He’s the adult who says “supposably”. The human being who calls it ValentiMes Day. The asshole who would never play craps if he couldn’t bet against the shooter.
I guess what I’m saying is I’m impressed with the price improvement today and the somewhat minimal damage done yesterday.
(20)
(2)