Craig, since you disliked my post and apparently d
Post# of 148147
First, as I said before, speculation. Your testimony would amount to speculation.
Second, lack of personal knowledge. You have admitted to not ever having seen the CRO contract, so your testimony as to what is in it would lack personal knowledge.
Third, best evidence rule (or essentially the document speaks for itself), as why should we listen to your testimony about what is in the CRO contact you never read, when we could merely and simply read the actual contract itself.
Also, probably an objection about improper expert testimony.
Maybe others, but you get the gist. Your testimony would be thrown out of a court of law, so why should we listen here to you on what the CRO contact says?