Capitol police warned busloads of BLM rioters were inbound from Baltimore on Jan. 6 wearing MAGA, Trump hats
WASHINGTON, DC- The January 6 narrative being pushed by the inept “Jan 6 Special Commission” along with their media handlers is coming apart at the seams.
In the same week when former junior aide to then-White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows , Cassidy Hutchinson used double-hearsay testimony in order to disparage Trump and in the process made an ass out of herself, we are now finding out that internal memos show the Capitol Police were warned about BLM infiltrators being bussed to the Capitol for the Jan. 6 demonstrations.
Gateway Pundit reports that according to a leaked internal memo, the U.S. Capitol Police intel unit warned that Black Lives Matter from Baltimore was bussing in embedded instigators posing as Trump supporters to incite violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
Investigative reporter Paul Sperry wrote:
BREAKING: Internal email reveals day before Jan 6 riot, US Capitol Police intel unit warned "BLM from Baltimore" was bussing in rioters: "BLM/Antif will wear MAGA hats, wear camo,and attempt to blend in with MAGA crowd" so violence blamed on Trump supporters attending Trump rally.
— Paul Sperry (@PaulSperry30) July 1, 2022
This isn’t the first time information has been gathered that indicates the Jan. 6 “insurrection” had more than casual involvement by federal law enforcement agencies and that assets from true terrorist organizations such as Black Lives Matter and Antifa were also involved.
According to Cristina Laila writing for Gateway Pundit in February 2021, she wrote that ex-Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund dropped a bombshell during a hearing before the Senate Rules and Homeland Security committees.
She wrote that Sund testified that intelligence gathered by law enforcement indicated that members of the Proud Boys, white supremacist groups, Antifa and other extremist groups were anticipated to be attending the Jan. 6 protest at the U.S. Capitol, and they may be inclined toward violence.
A former FBI agent, on the ground at the Capitol said that at least one busload of Antifa “goons” showed up at the Trump rally as part of a “false flag” operation.” Yet Democrat state media has ignored eyewitness accounts confirming at least one busload of Antifa operatives infiltrated peaceful Trump demonstrations .
Last week, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) entered testimony of eyewitness accounts from a man named Michael Waller into the record, accounts which detailed that he had witnessed “agents-provocateurs” at the U.S. Capitol on the afternoon of Jan. 6, 2021.
Waller, a senior strategy analyst at the Center for Security Policy who specializes in propaganda, psychological warfare, and subversion testified he was at the Capitol on Jan. 6 and saw:
Plainclothes militants. Militant, aggressive men in Donald Trump and MAGA gear at a front police line at the base of the temporary presidential inaugural platform;
Agents-provocateurs. Scattered groups of men exhorting the marchers to gather closely and tightly toward the center of the outside of the Capitol building and prevent them from leaving;
Fake Trump protesters. A few young men wearing Trump or MAGQA hats backwards and who did not fit in with the rest of the crowd in terms of their actions and demeanor, whom I presumed to be Antifa and other leftist agitators; and
Disciplined, uniformed column of attackers. A column of organized, disciplined men, waring similar but not identical camouflage uniforms and black gear, some with helmets and GoPro cameras or wearing subdued Punisher skull patches.
It should be noted that among those arrested after the Capitol riots was a man named John Sullivan, an Antifa insurgence leader who was arrested in Utah following the riot. He was caught on video posing as a Trump supporter during the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021. Sullivan had also organized an Antifa rally on January 6 near the Capitol, a fact that has been ignored by state media.
Sullivan’s Twitter page advertised a rally to “Kick these fascists out of DC January 6th, 2021,” further admonishing to “Dump Trump for Good.” It then gave the location as the Washington Monument at 11:00 a.m. on that date.
Yet none of this has been addressed by the Jan. 6 show trial committee, which continues to ignore any and all exculpatory claims in support of the former president and instead brings in an inept bimbo who in the best traditions of the band REO Speedwagon “heard it from a friend who….heard it from a friend who…heard it from another that…insert absurd allegation here.
For more on the January 6 US Capitol setup, we invite you to:
DIG DEEPER
The following contains editorial content within which is the opinion of the writer.—
WASHINGTON, DC- Law Enforcement Today, citing a Revolver News piece has previously reported on the number of “unindicted co-conspirators,” many believed to be federal agents, who were at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, and who were more than mere observers in the events which took place on that date.
While much of that reporting has been dismissed as “conspiracy theories,” one thing we have learned is that what was a conspiracy theory yesterday is a fact today. Now, that “conspiracy” theory seems to have gained some traction, courtesy of a reporter for the New York Times, who unwittingly admitted as much.
Breitbart News is reporting that a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter from the Lady in Gray claimed, “There were a ton of FBI informants amongst the people” at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021 according to a video released by Project Veritas.
Ironically, that reporter, Matthew Rosenberg, co-wrote an article titled, “The Next Big Lies: Jan. 6 Was No Big Deal, or a Left-Wing Plot.”
That article, co-written by Rosenberg, the Times’s national security correspondent, suggested that reports by conservative outlets that “the F.B.I. planted agents to stir up the crowd” was a “false flag,” “instant rewriting of history,” and a ‘reimagining” of January 6. Except in the case of Rosenberg, he meant none of it.
During an undercover conversation with a reporter from Project Veritas, Rosenberg said numerous times that the New York Times “went and uncovered the fact that like, there were a ton of FBI informants amongst the people who attacked the Capitol.” Things that make you go hmmm.
Rosenberg continued to explain that the outlet is going around bans intelligence agencies place on their people speaking with reporters by contacting those “who have recently left who are still talking to people on the inside [CIA/NSA] because people on the inside [CIA/NSA] cannot talk.”
Project Veritas released portions of the video, in which Rosenberg explained how he got “sucked into” writing an article on the January 6 anniversary by his managing editor at the Times. Rosenberg talked about a story he was involved in at the time which James O’Keefe, Project Veritas’s founder, identified as The Next Big Lies report.
“The story I got sucked into doing is like, I usually work for—I do investigative stuff. I usually do longer-term things, but I’m like I got back to work on Monday, and my managing editor had a great idea that he could’ve had a month ago. Cause he was like, ‘We should really—me and a colleague had done like a very like long seven-thousand word story last year in February about like kind of the ‘Big Lie,’ about the ‘Stop the Steal’ campaign, which was a very organized campaign. It wasn’t like an organic thing.
“He’s like, ‘Can we do like part two of that, like, what’s going on a year since January 6th, kind of like memory-holing it.’ Like maybe ‘it’s no big deal.’ Yeah. We can do that. IT’s like a little quick turnaround.
So that’s what we’ve been doing the last few days.”
Rosenberg then went on in the recording to talk about how he believes the left overreacted to the January 6 Capitol Riot, an event he referred to as “fun.”
“The left’s overreaction, the left’s reaction to it in some places, was so over the top. It was like, me and two other colleagues who were there [Jan. 6th], who were outside and we were just having fun,” Rosenberg said. “Dude, come on, like you [NYT staff] were not in any danger on Jan 6,” he continued.
The reporter from Project Veritas then asked Rosenberg about characterizing the Capitol siege as “fun,” asking him, “Are you allowed to have that much fun on January 6th? Aren’t you supposed to be mourning?”
In response, Rosenberg blamed the New York Times’s younger reporters, accusing them of presenting a “false sense” of danger while exaggerating their trauma from being present at the Capitol on Jan. 6.
“I know, I know, I’m supposed to be traumatized. But like all these colleagues who were in the [Capitol] building, and they’re young and are like, ‘Oh my Gog it was so scary!’ I’m like, ‘Fuck off,’” he said.
Rosenberg continued, telling the Project Veritas reporter that the Times wasn’t the type of work environment where he could tell his younger colleagues to “man up,” Breitbart said of the interview.
“It’s [the NYT] not the kind of place I can tell somebody to man up, but I kind of want to be like, ‘Dude, come on, like, you were not in any danger,’” Rosenberg recalled.
He then called out five New York Times co-workers by name and slammed them for exaggerating the “trauma” they endured on that day . He specifically identified Zolan Kanno Youngs, Adam Goldman and Sabrina Tabernise, referring to them as “fucking little dweebs who kept going on about their trauma. Shut the fuck up!”
He then identified two additional reporters from the Times, Emily Cochrane and Nick Fandos when asked by the Project Veritas reporter about which reporters from the outlet had written about their trauma.
“I don’t know if they wrote about their trauma. This chick named Emily Cochrane and this guy named Nick Fandos, who are both in their twenties. They cover Congress. So, like congressional reporters. Fuckin’ bitches,” Rosenberg is reported to have said.
https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/capitol-p...rump-hats/
WASHINGTON, DC- The January 6 narrative being pushed by the inept “Jan 6 Special Commission” along with their media handlers is coming apart at the seams.
In the same week when former junior aide to then-White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows , Cassidy Hutchinson used double-hearsay testimony in order to disparage Trump and in the process made an ass out of herself, we are now finding out that internal memos show the Capitol Police were warned about BLM infiltrators being bussed to the Capitol for the Jan. 6 demonstrations.
Gateway Pundit reports that according to a leaked internal memo, the U.S. Capitol Police intel unit warned that Black Lives Matter from Baltimore was bussing in embedded instigators posing as Trump supporters to incite violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
Investigative reporter Paul Sperry wrote:
BREAKING: Internal email reveals day before Jan 6 riot, US Capitol Police intel unit warned "BLM from Baltimore" was bussing in rioters: "BLM/Antif will wear MAGA hats, wear camo,and attempt to blend in with MAGA crowd" so violence blamed on Trump supporters attending Trump rally.
— Paul Sperry (@PaulSperry30) July 1, 2022
This isn’t the first time information has been gathered that indicates the Jan. 6 “insurrection” had more than casual involvement by federal law enforcement agencies and that assets from true terrorist organizations such as Black Lives Matter and Antifa were also involved.
According to Cristina Laila writing for Gateway Pundit in February 2021, she wrote that ex-Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund dropped a bombshell during a hearing before the Senate Rules and Homeland Security committees.
She wrote that Sund testified that intelligence gathered by law enforcement indicated that members of the Proud Boys, white supremacist groups, Antifa and other extremist groups were anticipated to be attending the Jan. 6 protest at the U.S. Capitol, and they may be inclined toward violence.
A former FBI agent, on the ground at the Capitol said that at least one busload of Antifa “goons” showed up at the Trump rally as part of a “false flag” operation.” Yet Democrat state media has ignored eyewitness accounts confirming at least one busload of Antifa operatives infiltrated peaceful Trump demonstrations .
Last week, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) entered testimony of eyewitness accounts from a man named Michael Waller into the record, accounts which detailed that he had witnessed “agents-provocateurs” at the U.S. Capitol on the afternoon of Jan. 6, 2021.
Waller, a senior strategy analyst at the Center for Security Policy who specializes in propaganda, psychological warfare, and subversion testified he was at the Capitol on Jan. 6 and saw:
Plainclothes militants. Militant, aggressive men in Donald Trump and MAGA gear at a front police line at the base of the temporary presidential inaugural platform;
Agents-provocateurs. Scattered groups of men exhorting the marchers to gather closely and tightly toward the center of the outside of the Capitol building and prevent them from leaving;
Fake Trump protesters. A few young men wearing Trump or MAGQA hats backwards and who did not fit in with the rest of the crowd in terms of their actions and demeanor, whom I presumed to be Antifa and other leftist agitators; and
Disciplined, uniformed column of attackers. A column of organized, disciplined men, waring similar but not identical camouflage uniforms and black gear, some with helmets and GoPro cameras or wearing subdued Punisher skull patches.
It should be noted that among those arrested after the Capitol riots was a man named John Sullivan, an Antifa insurgence leader who was arrested in Utah following the riot. He was caught on video posing as a Trump supporter during the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021. Sullivan had also organized an Antifa rally on January 6 near the Capitol, a fact that has been ignored by state media.
Sullivan’s Twitter page advertised a rally to “Kick these fascists out of DC January 6th, 2021,” further admonishing to “Dump Trump for Good.” It then gave the location as the Washington Monument at 11:00 a.m. on that date.
Yet none of this has been addressed by the Jan. 6 show trial committee, which continues to ignore any and all exculpatory claims in support of the former president and instead brings in an inept bimbo who in the best traditions of the band REO Speedwagon “heard it from a friend who….heard it from a friend who…heard it from another that…insert absurd allegation here.
For more on the January 6 US Capitol setup, we invite you to:
DIG DEEPER
The following contains editorial content within which is the opinion of the writer.—
WASHINGTON, DC- Law Enforcement Today, citing a Revolver News piece has previously reported on the number of “unindicted co-conspirators,” many believed to be federal agents, who were at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, and who were more than mere observers in the events which took place on that date.
While much of that reporting has been dismissed as “conspiracy theories,” one thing we have learned is that what was a conspiracy theory yesterday is a fact today. Now, that “conspiracy” theory seems to have gained some traction, courtesy of a reporter for the New York Times, who unwittingly admitted as much.
Breitbart News is reporting that a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter from the Lady in Gray claimed, “There were a ton of FBI informants amongst the people” at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021 according to a video released by Project Veritas.
Ironically, that reporter, Matthew Rosenberg, co-wrote an article titled, “The Next Big Lies: Jan. 6 Was No Big Deal, or a Left-Wing Plot.”
That article, co-written by Rosenberg, the Times’s national security correspondent, suggested that reports by conservative outlets that “the F.B.I. planted agents to stir up the crowd” was a “false flag,” “instant rewriting of history,” and a ‘reimagining” of January 6. Except in the case of Rosenberg, he meant none of it.
During an undercover conversation with a reporter from Project Veritas, Rosenberg said numerous times that the New York Times “went and uncovered the fact that like, there were a ton of FBI informants amongst the people who attacked the Capitol.” Things that make you go hmmm.
Rosenberg continued to explain that the outlet is going around bans intelligence agencies place on their people speaking with reporters by contacting those “who have recently left who are still talking to people on the inside [CIA/NSA] because people on the inside [CIA/NSA] cannot talk.”
Project Veritas released portions of the video, in which Rosenberg explained how he got “sucked into” writing an article on the January 6 anniversary by his managing editor at the Times. Rosenberg talked about a story he was involved in at the time which James O’Keefe, Project Veritas’s founder, identified as The Next Big Lies report.
“The story I got sucked into doing is like, I usually work for—I do investigative stuff. I usually do longer-term things, but I’m like I got back to work on Monday, and my managing editor had a great idea that he could’ve had a month ago. Cause he was like, ‘We should really—me and a colleague had done like a very like long seven-thousand word story last year in February about like kind of the ‘Big Lie,’ about the ‘Stop the Steal’ campaign, which was a very organized campaign. It wasn’t like an organic thing.
“He’s like, ‘Can we do like part two of that, like, what’s going on a year since January 6th, kind of like memory-holing it.’ Like maybe ‘it’s no big deal.’ Yeah. We can do that. IT’s like a little quick turnaround.
So that’s what we’ve been doing the last few days.”
Rosenberg then went on in the recording to talk about how he believes the left overreacted to the January 6 Capitol Riot, an event he referred to as “fun.”
“The left’s overreaction, the left’s reaction to it in some places, was so over the top. It was like, me and two other colleagues who were there [Jan. 6th], who were outside and we were just having fun,” Rosenberg said. “Dude, come on, like you [NYT staff] were not in any danger on Jan 6,” he continued.
The reporter from Project Veritas then asked Rosenberg about characterizing the Capitol siege as “fun,” asking him, “Are you allowed to have that much fun on January 6th? Aren’t you supposed to be mourning?”
In response, Rosenberg blamed the New York Times’s younger reporters, accusing them of presenting a “false sense” of danger while exaggerating their trauma from being present at the Capitol on Jan. 6.
“I know, I know, I’m supposed to be traumatized. But like all these colleagues who were in the [Capitol] building, and they’re young and are like, ‘Oh my Gog it was so scary!’ I’m like, ‘Fuck off,’” he said.
Rosenberg continued, telling the Project Veritas reporter that the Times wasn’t the type of work environment where he could tell his younger colleagues to “man up,” Breitbart said of the interview.
“It’s [the NYT] not the kind of place I can tell somebody to man up, but I kind of want to be like, ‘Dude, come on, like, you were not in any danger,’” Rosenberg recalled.
He then called out five New York Times co-workers by name and slammed them for exaggerating the “trauma” they endured on that day . He specifically identified Zolan Kanno Youngs, Adam Goldman and Sabrina Tabernise, referring to them as “fucking little dweebs who kept going on about their trauma. Shut the fuck up!”
He then identified two additional reporters from the Times, Emily Cochrane and Nick Fandos when asked by the Project Veritas reporter about which reporters from the outlet had written about their trauma.
“I don’t know if they wrote about their trauma. This chick named Emily Cochrane and this guy named Nick Fandos, who are both in their twenties. They cover Congress. So, like congressional reporters. Fuckin’ bitches,” Rosenberg is reported to have said.
https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/capitol-p...rump-hats/
