To specifically answer that post quetion Does S
Post# of 13634
(Total Views: 123)
Posted On: 09/02/2022 10:56:11 AM
Re: ThreeEmInEn #2723
To specifically answer that post quetion
"What else would explain why they issue a 14c (insurance policy for the funding of the Med-RI), cancel a 14c (Other funding was secured 14C insurance no longer needed so cancelled), reissue a 14c (insurance policy for the funding of the US solar panel manufacturing facility) once other funding for this project is secured this 14c will be cancelled as well (etc)"
SNPW ABSOLUTELY HAS A GOOD HANDLE WHEN THEY NEED THE OPTION FOR A RS (as an option to fund a new projects until another option of financing is secured), AND THEY HAVE A BETTER HANDLE TO CANCEL THE RS WHEN IT IS NO LONGER NEEDED WHEN OTHER FINANCING OPTIONS ARE SECURED.
Quote:
Does SNPW really have a good handle on if they do or don't need a reverse split?
"What else would explain why they issue a 14c (insurance policy for the funding of the Med-RI), cancel a 14c (Other funding was secured 14C insurance no longer needed so cancelled), reissue a 14c (insurance policy for the funding of the US solar panel manufacturing facility) once other funding for this project is secured this 14c will be cancelled as well (etc)"
SNPW ABSOLUTELY HAS A GOOD HANDLE WHEN THEY NEED THE OPTION FOR A RS (as an option to fund a new projects until another option of financing is secured), AND THEY HAVE A BETTER HANDLE TO CANCEL THE RS WHEN IT IS NO LONGER NEEDED WHEN OTHER FINANCING OPTIONS ARE SECURED.
(0)
(0)