The amount of bearish bets against Hong Kong stock
Post# of 24765
![](/assets/46931549/no_avatar_available_thumb.jpg)
Hedge funds and other short sellers say they’re either covering bearish wagers or planning to do so, strategist Gilbert Wong wrote in emailed comments Wednesday. Short-selling activity was running at just under 20% of total turnover on the city’s stock market this week, a level not seen since May, calculations by Bloomberg based on exchange data showed.
“We believe the risk of short squeeze in China and Hong Kong equities is rising,” Wong said. “Stay alert.”
Betting against Hong Kong’s stock market has proven to be a profitable trade this year, with the Hang Seng Index down over 20% at its low point in March on fears of an economic slowdown and regulatory overreach. Global investors are so underweight Chinese assets that bearish equity bets were considered one of the most-crowded trades in Bank of America Corp.’s investor survey earlier this year.
But it can also be a perilous one -- in the middle of that month, a coordinated pledge from China’s top regulators to address investor concerns triggered a two-day, 17% surge in the benchmark.
Theories on what could lead to a rebound this time range from beaten-down valuations, low positioning after August redemptions and signs of increased stimulus from Beijing. The Hang Seng climbed as much as 3.3% Thursday after China announced additional measures to boost infrastructure spending. The Hang Seng Tech index rallied 5.3%, with Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. surging 8.1%.
While short-covering flows may have little to do with fundamental changes in the outlook for Chinese equities, some investors are behaving like the best of the bearish-China trade is behind them.
“They believe further market downside is limited from current levels because positioning is low and very defensive,” said Wong.
One ticker that is Hong Kong based, that some traders have looked at to also have short squeeze potential is Regencell Bioscience Ltd.
The short volume ratio has a similar pattern to that of GameStop with both averaging over 40% in the past year. In fact, Regencell has sometimes been more heavily shorted than GameStop, with occasional days close to 90% shorted.
Although Regencell and GameStop stocks’ short volume profiles might be considered to be similar, not as much is known about Regencell. As of May 16, the company’s founder and CEO held 10,539,159 ordinary shares, representing 81% of the total number of issued and outstanding ordinary shares in Regencell.
Regencell’s total cumulative short volume, as reported by a third-party data analytics provider, is over 19 million shares, while the total outstanding shares less CEO and Chairman’s shares is only approximately 2.4 million, yet Regencell is still trading over 289% its IPO price. Its total reported short volume to outstanding shares ratio (excluding CEO and Chairman’s shares ratio) is almost double of GameStop, being approximately 8 times whereas GameStop is slightly over 4 times. GameStop is currently trading 50x over its historical low of $2.52. Where are all the extra shares coming from?
As witnessed on Reddit and other social media and forums, especially during the GameStop short squeeze, retail shareholders came together, driven by the community’s effort to punish market participants who make a living shorting and distorting public companies, causing them to stumble and fall.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-...ley-quants
https://www.benzinga.com/general/biotech/22/0...rs-short-i
![Like This Post](/images/thumb-up.png)
![Dislike This Post](/images/thumb-down.png)