If this were a dilution scam, the vote on locking
Post# of 16816
If this were a dilution scam, the vote on locking the share structure would never have been held. We would be in the 6B range by now and at no bid. Fact is the share price is stable and the stock is tradable.
I don't know what the people on scamHub know or don't know. As has been reported by several people here, the filings have been held up due to something (I don't know what it/they are) that the lawyers want to see completed. Once that's done "normal" trading will resume as information starts flowing.
We know why there are no PR's right now -- because with the STOP sign in place a PR would automatically generate a Caveat Emptor sign.
Want to know who I found that out from? Matt Dwyer. He cares enough about his shareholders not to dilute them to oblivion or to have a CE label on the company he is CEO of. Whenever the filings are released we'll know whatever $BCAP's counsel insists we know in that Q's notes.
I'll tell you one other thing, also worth thinking about. With the share structure maxed, the Preferred that Matt Dwyer holds are worthless. Why? Because he has no way to convert them to Common. Basically Matt Dwyer's salary for the last year or so has been deferred.