My expectations are reduced in a settlement with A
Post# of 148166
Being smart about this is everything for our future directions and choices. I would be ok with something they could pay and would give us a financial benefit to limit our future partners or possible partnerships to just one more partner for either mTNBC or Nash but not both. I don’t believe our current HIV partner will actually come through and Nader re-signing with them was probably not a good move. Regnum has nothing to work with but we will see how that works out. Luckily we have performance standards they have to meet or we can dissolve the partnership.
Something like 25-50 million dollars from Amarex might be attainable but would this much help us? Yes… it will but not for a long time. Better to have a cash infusion then dilution.
We could get another cash infusion if a future mTNBC or Nash partner pre-pays us at signing for say 50 million or more. So when we think about this possible future partnership. It probably won’t happen until we see where our legal issues and clinical hold are resolved from the conversation. We need to resolve a few things it would seem before big catalysts can take place. I like your timeline MGK_2. It reminds me of a Nader time line with a moving date. Not saying you dates are wrong just very optimistic and hell… I like optimistic.