We went over this too many times. Per" letter o
Post# of 13242
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df72d/df72ddfa94b3e9c73dfd6acc1fc12375a5db2038" alt="Avatar"
Per" letter of intent"
RI-DEM's "FINAL REVIEW" passed every thing that was later cited in the first half of the denial as a reason to denied.
"The purpose of this letter is to communicate the Department’s intent
to approve the license pursuant to R.I.G.L. 23-18.9-9 and this letter is not the issuance of the facility license at this time. Rather, it is the result of a final review of your application and the initiation of the statutorily mandated public hearing process"
http://dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/waste/pn/...er-noi.pdf
It is hard to believe that RI-DEM was incompetent in offering their "FINAL REVIEW" of all the application without reviewing the cited items they later denied. So assuming the RI-DEM is competent all those cited items were all approved in the "FINAL REVIEW' before sending SNPW a letter of intent to approve.
The second half (the new law R.I. Gen. Laws § 23-19.17-2) of the denial did not exist at the time of the "intent to approve" was sent, therefore should not legally be cited as a reason to deny the project as it had no bearing of this pre-law project.
http://dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/waste/med...071321.pdf
FINAL (review) definition
coming at the end of a series.
last, closing, finishing, concluding
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6129c/6129c37a1084aa51a9aad0a48fbaafe917c16dcc" alt="Like This Post"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2afd3/2afd37d70555658bad2875d9bb65d1937c8e7c70" alt="Dislike This Post"