And what does this have to with threats against CR
Post# of 11040
(Total Views: 422)
Posted On: 06/16/2022 2:10:42 PM
And what does this have to with threats against CRGP investor property?
Absolutely nothing. Spin game to cover up their abuse of narrative controls. violation of 1st and 4th amendment rights of US citizens, participating in an organized manner to manipulate perception by deceiving users to follow rules that do not protect the risk of loss of property. Weaponizing policy and outcomes to destroy property value. Act as a vehicle to interrupt, intercept, and manipulate the individual/owners property rights exchanged in financial markets...I think you get the picture!!!! A whole lot of cloak and dagger to deceive and help steal your property away from you (thru devaluation) is what it all comes down too.
IH Admin [Tisha]
Thursday, June 16, 2022 11:46:13 AM
Some users have difficulty understanding how to refute information without personally attacking others or putting off-topic content in their posts. Example:
Message: That house is blue.
Reply: What are you frigging color blind?!?! You didn't pass "colors" in Kindergarten? That house is obviously green.
This is off-topic (content about another user) and a personal attack and should be removed.
Reply: Hmmmm, are you an artist? Are you a painter? Do you work at Sherwin Williams? Could you share with us what your expertise and qualifications are in determining various colors because I thought the house was green?
This is off-topic (content about another user) and should be removed.
Reply: Some people here obviously have an agenda. Imagine what idiots they must think we are to try and state that a house that is clearly green is blue...Geesh, the lengths some people will go to.
This is off-topic (content about other users) and should be removed.
Reply: Interesting - the house looks green to me.
This is focusing on and disagreeing with the information and should remain.
Reply: Wrong, that statement is false.
This is focusing on and disagreeing with the information and should remain.
Users are welcome to rebut and refute posts with which they disagree. When doing so, the respondent must keep their posts on-topic and omit content about the other user. Debate the message, don't attack the messenger.
Here's a post with an even more detailed explanation:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg...d=29132548
$13
$CRGP
Absolutely nothing. Spin game to cover up their abuse of narrative controls. violation of 1st and 4th amendment rights of US citizens, participating in an organized manner to manipulate perception by deceiving users to follow rules that do not protect the risk of loss of property. Weaponizing policy and outcomes to destroy property value. Act as a vehicle to interrupt, intercept, and manipulate the individual/owners property rights exchanged in financial markets...I think you get the picture!!!! A whole lot of cloak and dagger to deceive and help steal your property away from you (thru devaluation) is what it all comes down too.
IH Admin [Tisha]
Thursday, June 16, 2022 11:46:13 AM
Some users have difficulty understanding how to refute information without personally attacking others or putting off-topic content in their posts. Example:
Message: That house is blue.
Reply: What are you frigging color blind?!?! You didn't pass "colors" in Kindergarten? That house is obviously green.
This is off-topic (content about another user) and a personal attack and should be removed.
Reply: Hmmmm, are you an artist? Are you a painter? Do you work at Sherwin Williams? Could you share with us what your expertise and qualifications are in determining various colors because I thought the house was green?
This is off-topic (content about another user) and should be removed.
Reply: Some people here obviously have an agenda. Imagine what idiots they must think we are to try and state that a house that is clearly green is blue...Geesh, the lengths some people will go to.
This is off-topic (content about other users) and should be removed.
Reply: Interesting - the house looks green to me.
This is focusing on and disagreeing with the information and should remain.
Reply: Wrong, that statement is false.
This is focusing on and disagreeing with the information and should remain.
Users are welcome to rebut and refute posts with which they disagree. When doing so, the respondent must keep their posts on-topic and omit content about the other user. Debate the message, don't attack the messenger.
Here's a post with an even more detailed explanation:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg...d=29132548
$13
$CRGP
(0)
(0)Calissio Resources Group, Inc. (CRGP) Stock Research Links
U.S. Constitution
"The Preamble
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Oath
"I solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America"
The Flag
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
"The Preamble
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Oath
"I solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America"
The Flag
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
Quote:
If the broker-dealer fails to deliver for 13 days, the regulation imposes a “close out” duty to purchase and deliver securities “of like kind and quantity.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/20...ify%20wall
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/m...v-manning/