I'll merely point out that you claimed that CYDY m
Post# of 148331
A fallacious conclusion, to say the least, particularly as it is based on a complete misapprehension of how corporations usually pay their top management and Board.
Then, you try to dig yourself out of the hole you dug for yourself by saying that the many other companies who pay in stock, warrants, and options, are "CONTRACTUALLY OBLIGATED" (screaming capitalization yours).
So what does that have to do with anything? Are you saying that you have knowledge that CYDY was not "contractually obligated" and that they changed their means of remuneration? That is your snide little implication -- one that is, like almost everything you post, completely unsupported by facts.
You don't like being called on your misstatements, and you try to shift the conversation to claim that other people said something they didn't, and that what you said wasn't what you said.
We all see through you.
Since you so enjoy my aphorisms, here's another one for you:
"when you're in a deep hole, stop digging."