It's bullshit for credulous very poorly educated n
Post# of 123675
(Total Views: 178)
Posted On: 06/09/2022 1:58:43 PM
It's bullshit for credulous very poorly educated nitwits. Nobody said there was a shortage of such on the right.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_Mules
Media outlets such as PolitiFact, the Associated Press, and The Washington Post criticized the film for its factual errors and omissions, making implausible claims, and promoting conspiracy theories about the supposed theft of the 2020 presidential election.
The Post characterized the film as presenting "the least convincing election-fraud theory yet".[16][6][12][9][15]
Writing in The Bulwark, Republican author and political advisor Amanda Carpenter characterized 2000 Mules as "a hilarious mockumentary" that "doesn't survive the most basic fact-checks to support its most important claims".
Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro of The Daily Wire said, "I think the conclusion of the film is not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected.
Maybe they will be connected, but they haven't been connected in the film."[33] The conservative[34] The Dispatch wrote that "The film's ballot harvesting theory is full of holes" and that "D'Souza has a history of promoting false and misleading claims".[35]
Philip Bump of The Washington Post summarized a discussion with D'Souza as "D'Souza admits his movie does not show evidence to prove his claims about ballots being collected and submitted."[36]
The Associated Press (AP) reported that the film relies on "faulty assumptions, anonymous accounts and improper analysis of cellphone location data" provided by True the Vote, a conservative vote-monitoring organization.[6]
National Public Radio (NPR) found that True the Vote "made multiple misleading or false claims about its [own] work".[7] AP reported that the film's assertion that True the Vote identified 1,155 paid mules in Philadelphia alone was false.
The film presented a single unverified anonymous witness who said she saw people picking up what she "assumed" were payments for ballot collection in Arizona; no evidence of payments was presented in any of the other four states.[6] The film characterizes the alleged operation as "ballot trafficking" with "stash houses", but presents no evidence that ballots were illegally collected to be deposited in drop boxes and does not claim any ballots were unlawful.[6][8][9][10]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_Mules
Media outlets such as PolitiFact, the Associated Press, and The Washington Post criticized the film for its factual errors and omissions, making implausible claims, and promoting conspiracy theories about the supposed theft of the 2020 presidential election.
The Post characterized the film as presenting "the least convincing election-fraud theory yet".[16][6][12][9][15]
Writing in The Bulwark, Republican author and political advisor Amanda Carpenter characterized 2000 Mules as "a hilarious mockumentary" that "doesn't survive the most basic fact-checks to support its most important claims".
Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro of The Daily Wire said, "I think the conclusion of the film is not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected.
Maybe they will be connected, but they haven't been connected in the film."[33] The conservative[34] The Dispatch wrote that "The film's ballot harvesting theory is full of holes" and that "D'Souza has a history of promoting false and misleading claims".[35]
Philip Bump of The Washington Post summarized a discussion with D'Souza as "D'Souza admits his movie does not show evidence to prove his claims about ballots being collected and submitted."[36]
The Associated Press (AP) reported that the film relies on "faulty assumptions, anonymous accounts and improper analysis of cellphone location data" provided by True the Vote, a conservative vote-monitoring organization.[6]
National Public Radio (NPR) found that True the Vote "made multiple misleading or false claims about its [own] work".[7] AP reported that the film's assertion that True the Vote identified 1,155 paid mules in Philadelphia alone was false.
The film presented a single unverified anonymous witness who said she saw people picking up what she "assumed" were payments for ballot collection in Arizona; no evidence of payments was presented in any of the other four states.[6] The film characterizes the alleged operation as "ballot trafficking" with "stash houses", but presents no evidence that ballots were illegally collected to be deposited in drop boxes and does not claim any ballots were unlawful.[6][8][9][10]
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼