That alone should have spoke volumes to Patterson, that how in the world are these patients receiving LL who are getting a 48% increase in CD4 T cells when HIV should have been killing their CD4 target.
If LL was supposed to be taming the immune system, should there not have been a reduction, a down regulation in CD4 T Cell quantity and activity?
I guess he was just caught up on the fact that in HIV, LL operates as a viral entry inhibitor and didn't consider what was happening regarding immune regulation at all when it was screaming signs of being upregulated.
If LL was supposed to be taming the immune system, should there not have been a reduction, a down regulation in CD4 T Cell quantity and activity?
I guess he was just caught up on the fact that in HIV, LL operates as a viral entry inhibitor and didn't consider what was happening regarding immune regulation at all when it was screaming signs of being upregulated.
1