MAJOR Gaps Found in Anti-Trump Story Pushed By Clinton
There are holes in Sussmann’s story big enough to throw the CIA through. The so called Alfa Bank Trump data exchange was not “technically plausible.”
Not only that, it was “user created and not machine/tool generated.” That means a “setup.” John Durham is one of those guys who likes to come in to the office when everyone else goes home. That way he doesn’t need to deal with a ringing telephone. His special team of lawyers hit the send button on another of those late night filings Friday night and Hillary Clinton is calling her spin doctor for an emergency prescription.
Spooks called data exchange fake
A document was filed electronically by Special Counsel John Durham on Friday, April 15, indicating his team “just dropped the hammer on Hillary Clinton.” His investigators “found major ‘gaps‘ in the anti-Trump story being pushed by Clinton and her campaign.” Uncle Sam’s professional spooks knew it was fishy from the beginning.
“Agency-2,” which could be either the CIA or NSA, reported that the alleged “Alfa Bank Trump data exchange” was not “technically plausible.”
The reason for their assessment is because it wasn’t a log of automatic routing. The pings were “user created and not machine/tool generated.” That matters a lot to Hillary.
It’s still too soon, Durham explains to the court, to say for sure whether this data was specifically “fabricated” to hurt President Donald Trump. His office is dogging the FBI but haven’t been able to get them to cough up all the goods yet.
He can say for certain, though, that “Agency 2” concluded it “contained gaps, conflicted with itself,” and did not “withstand technical scrutiny.” That same alphabet intelligence agency concluded “that the data behind the anti-Trump hoax was not ‘technically plausible‘ and was ‘user created.’” Durham quoted that in the filing.
At a minimum, Durham argues, “the Government does expect to adduce evidence at trial reflecting (i) the fact that the FBI and Agency-2 concluded that the Russian Bank-1 allegations were untrue and unsupported and (ii) the primary bases for these conclusions, including the particular investigative and analytical steps taken by these agencies.” The FBI is terrified to write a report so they’re continuing the investigation.
That’s the trick Eric Holder used to hide Uranium One from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.
The FBI still owes a final report on that investigation and William Campbell is still waiting to testify. The “FBI did not reach an ultimate conclusion regarding the data’s accuracy or whether it might have been in whole or in part genuine, spoofed, altered, or fabricated.”
https://newshourfirst.com/2022/04/28/major-ga...%20Clinton
There are holes in Sussmann’s story big enough to throw the CIA through. The so called Alfa Bank Trump data exchange was not “technically plausible.”
Not only that, it was “user created and not machine/tool generated.” That means a “setup.” John Durham is one of those guys who likes to come in to the office when everyone else goes home. That way he doesn’t need to deal with a ringing telephone. His special team of lawyers hit the send button on another of those late night filings Friday night and Hillary Clinton is calling her spin doctor for an emergency prescription.
Spooks called data exchange fake
A document was filed electronically by Special Counsel John Durham on Friday, April 15, indicating his team “just dropped the hammer on Hillary Clinton.” His investigators “found major ‘gaps‘ in the anti-Trump story being pushed by Clinton and her campaign.” Uncle Sam’s professional spooks knew it was fishy from the beginning.
“Agency-2,” which could be either the CIA or NSA, reported that the alleged “Alfa Bank Trump data exchange” was not “technically plausible.”
The reason for their assessment is because it wasn’t a log of automatic routing. The pings were “user created and not machine/tool generated.” That matters a lot to Hillary.
It’s still too soon, Durham explains to the court, to say for sure whether this data was specifically “fabricated” to hurt President Donald Trump. His office is dogging the FBI but haven’t been able to get them to cough up all the goods yet.
He can say for certain, though, that “Agency 2” concluded it “contained gaps, conflicted with itself,” and did not “withstand technical scrutiny.” That same alphabet intelligence agency concluded “that the data behind the anti-Trump hoax was not ‘technically plausible‘ and was ‘user created.’” Durham quoted that in the filing.
At a minimum, Durham argues, “the Government does expect to adduce evidence at trial reflecting (i) the fact that the FBI and Agency-2 concluded that the Russian Bank-1 allegations were untrue and unsupported and (ii) the primary bases for these conclusions, including the particular investigative and analytical steps taken by these agencies.” The FBI is terrified to write a report so they’re continuing the investigation.
That’s the trick Eric Holder used to hide Uranium One from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.
The FBI still owes a final report on that investigation and William Campbell is still waiting to testify. The “FBI did not reach an ultimate conclusion regarding the data’s accuracy or whether it might have been in whole or in part genuine, spoofed, altered, or fabricated.”
https://newshourfirst.com/2022/04/28/major-ga...%20Clinton
