Figgs: In response to your last post, Nader wasn'
Post# of 154094
(Total Views: 518)
Posted On: 04/29/2022 9:41:11 AM
Figgs: In response to your last post, Nader wasn't "playing outside the box", the fact is, he didn't know the rules (or the box) and was recklessly playing fast and loose which is why the SEC/DOJ had to become involved. He wasn't some hero, he was actually ignorant of the proper way to do things, which is also why EVERYTHING he touched turned out the way it did for the past 3 years and CYDY has no approvals, EUA, funding...
Nader wasn't "shaking the tree", he was grinning while shaking a live telephone poll with wet hands and now the BOD "killed" him because of it.
Also, it is reckless and incorrect to say "800,000 dead on remdesivir" because that implies they were all on it and it killed them. None of that is true.
One has to assume that the current BOD is doing what it thinks it should in order to put CYDY in the best position, whether it be for licensing, partnership, buyout...whatever.
And make no mistake, the current BOD doesn't care about the support of this chatboard one iota. If that isn't clear to you by now...
Nader wasn't "shaking the tree", he was grinning while shaking a live telephone poll with wet hands and now the BOD "killed" him because of it.
Also, it is reckless and incorrect to say "800,000 dead on remdesivir" because that implies they were all on it and it killed them. None of that is true.
One has to assume that the current BOD is doing what it thinks it should in order to put CYDY in the best position, whether it be for licensing, partnership, buyout...whatever.
And make no mistake, the current BOD doesn't care about the support of this chatboard one iota. If that isn't clear to you by now...
(15)
(0)