The latest issued PR continues terminology that I
Post# of 690
The latest issued PR continues terminology that I find highly offensive and that is insensitive and reprehensible in the faith that I practice (to the best of my ability).
For them to make a reference to Deity as they have (blasphemous) , and simply state that "we were just quoting the owner", I find unacceptable and will not tolerate.
Best of luck to all.