“Misinformation” It’s a catch all…. Is
Post# of 154646
(Total Views: 453)
Posted On: 03/29/2022 12:55:17 PM
Re: craigakess #120829
“Misinformation” It’s a catch all….
Is Leronlimab misinformation? Ask the FDA about Covid and Leronlimab. Seems pretty easy to chalk that up as misinformation with the FDAs most recent bash of Leronlimab.
So yes Twitter can delete your post about Leronlimab. It’s simple. Happens all the time to ivermectin and other drugs. And no I don’t want to talk about ivermectin but if people can’t draw the parallels there then I don’t know what to tell people at this point. People still defend the FDA here. Hilarious after the Alzheimer’s debacle among many others like the opioid epidemic we’ve been facing all for money.
“The next question that logically follows is whether a social media company can restrict or exercise editorial control over content on its platform. Sec. 230(c)(2) of the CDA answers this, by precluding liability for decisions to remove or restrict access. As was recently seen following the 2020 Presidential election, Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, YouTube (Google), Reddit, and Twitch (Amazon) also justified their suspension of the accounts of President Trump and some of his supporters under Sec. 230(c)(2) for continuing to post ******misinformation*****, hate speech, and inflammatory content about the election.”
Misinformation. Hilarious standard for free speech….
Is Leronlimab misinformation? Ask the FDA about Covid and Leronlimab. Seems pretty easy to chalk that up as misinformation with the FDAs most recent bash of Leronlimab.
So yes Twitter can delete your post about Leronlimab. It’s simple. Happens all the time to ivermectin and other drugs. And no I don’t want to talk about ivermectin but if people can’t draw the parallels there then I don’t know what to tell people at this point. People still defend the FDA here. Hilarious after the Alzheimer’s debacle among many others like the opioid epidemic we’ve been facing all for money.
“The next question that logically follows is whether a social media company can restrict or exercise editorial control over content on its platform. Sec. 230(c)(2) of the CDA answers this, by precluding liability for decisions to remove or restrict access. As was recently seen following the 2020 Presidential election, Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, YouTube (Google), Reddit, and Twitch (Amazon) also justified their suspension of the accounts of President Trump and some of his supporters under Sec. 230(c)(2) for continuing to post ******misinformation*****, hate speech, and inflammatory content about the election.”
Misinformation. Hilarious standard for free speech….
(4)
(0)