You are right… I should not of said “great”

You are right… I should not of said “great” Nash results because that implies that maybe none were better. I am just saying we don’t know if great is even possible without doing the biopsy test that is required in a phase 3 trial. So what is great or better than ever before actually mean if we achieve that in our phase 2 trial?

If the people that know what is great results and better than ever before… then you are likely right… the stock may see a bump in price on speculation. I wasn’t even thinking about stock price and was more trying to show partnership or buy out opportunities and how likely a phase 3 will be necessary before those talks are even considered.

Once again… “great” results will like you say… give us stock price value and I overstated what I was trying to say. Sorry about that.