Petrosino Assvisors Wealth Inhibitors track record
Post# of 1418
(Total Views: 295)
Posted On: 03/09/2022 1:43:29 PM
Petrosino Assvisors Wealth Inhibitors track record for losing money and conning people...
Started pumping NeoMedia Technologie (NEOM) in 2004. Visionary of 2D barcodes that existed all over the place but he didn't realize it. Maybe he bought it in 2000 and lost 20,000%?
Even if he bought in 2004, he lost everything. The company did a bunch of reverse splits and 5.088B outstanding. Hey, but it's up today 9900.00%
0.0001 ▲ 0.000099 (9900.00%)
Mkt Cap 554.64K
His next pump job was MONI back 2012. He had $30K watch it drop to next to nothing. Get this... even after that he's still a 'believer' and pumping it like a bitch today. That one is up too today 0.0001 (0.97%). I can't even find a filing
Moon Equity Holdings MONI:OTCPK
0.01045 ▲ 0.0001 (0.97%)
Hard to claim you've been tricked with one stock when you've been activity not only pumping it, but involved with pumping scamy companies even today.
So why is he 'good' with losing money on those other two scams but has a hard on for Gerald?
The answer is not only obvious, but sad
Started pumping NeoMedia Technologie (NEOM) in 2004. Visionary of 2D barcodes that existed all over the place but he didn't realize it. Maybe he bought it in 2000 and lost 20,000%?
Even if he bought in 2004, he lost everything. The company did a bunch of reverse splits and 5.088B outstanding. Hey, but it's up today 9900.00%
0.0001 ▲ 0.000099 (9900.00%)
Mkt Cap 554.64K
His next pump job was MONI back 2012. He had $30K watch it drop to next to nothing. Get this... even after that he's still a 'believer' and pumping it like a bitch today. That one is up too today 0.0001 (0.97%). I can't even find a filing
Moon Equity Holdings MONI:OTCPK
0.01045 ▲ 0.0001 (0.97%)
Hard to claim you've been tricked with one stock when you've been activity not only pumping it, but involved with pumping scamy companies even today.
So why is he 'good' with losing money on those other two scams but has a hard on for Gerald?
The answer is not only obvious, but sad
(1)
(0)