There's very little chance that the person who aut
Post# of 153875
(Total Views: 684)
Posted On: 02/23/2022 8:40:58 AM
There's very little chance that the person who authored this warning letter cares about anything other than completing the task of issuing the letter, which is their job.
The minute he got done compiling the information into the typical format and doing a minimum amount of research to ensure he had names and addresses correct, he hit send and then slid some other complaint onto his desk to begin working on.
What I want to know is who brought all of that information to cubicle 46 and told them to work up the letter? And who gave that person the information?
My guess is that it's the same someone(s) who have been compiling "evidence" of sec violations (take your pick from the many douchebags actively fighting against CYDY's success) and either bombarding this department with information they should be acting on, or they simply handed it over to someone up their chain who has connections within the FDA. Maybe the same person who helped get the unprecedented FDA rebuke published during trading hours. They walked it over and dropped it on the top of some grunt's pile, explaining that it needed to be rushed through because it's covid-related and very dangerous to the public. Drop what you're doing 46, and get this one out right away. Your country is counting on you. I've been asked to provide you with this picture of a bald eagle, this short gif of fighter jets flying over the Dallas Cowboys stadium, a usb stick full of songs about F-150's, and a 4-pack of Monster Energy drinks to aid you in your efforts. Roll tide, son.
In the end though, it's just more horseshit. It's a warning letter that many other companies receive on what is probably a regular basis. Cytodyn gets to respond and that could result in absolutely nothing happening. Or they may have to issue a retraction and make sure the 2,000 people who watched the proactive video are notified.
When someone dies you have to publish publicly that they've passed so that any potential creditors have a chance to make a claim against the estate. It has to stay up for five days, or something. So what do you do? You post in a local newspaper, wait your required days, and then move on because nobody notices or cares. I can envision something like that happening in the Oregonian, or whatever hipster name they have for their local newsrag.
"Investors may have noticed in Cytodyn's Proactive Video on X/X/XX that former CEO Nadar Pourhassan misspoke when discussing Cytodyn's drug candidate Leronlimab as it pertains to Covid-19 treatment. At this time, Leronlimab is still in trials to prove its efficacy, and not approved for treating Covid-19 patients with any level of disease severity. Any suggestion otherwise was made in error by our former CEO and we regret any confusion. If you or someone you know should get sick with Covid-19 the FDA requires us to remind you that you just need to take Remdesivir and you'll be safe. Roll tide."
Clearly whoever has been engaged in discussions with us has agreed to do so despite Nader flashing three fingers on occasion. I'm not worried about this letter. To me it's not indicative of any sort of new or increased pressure from the FDA against Cytodyn, but rather continued bullshit that we're already aware of. The FDA is huge. This isn't traveling around from one department to the next. It's just one guy in one department cranking out some work that no other department is going to be aware of unless they go searching. And why would they? They're too busy jerking off into the free Remdesivir golf towels they got as a thank you for saving the world.
The minute he got done compiling the information into the typical format and doing a minimum amount of research to ensure he had names and addresses correct, he hit send and then slid some other complaint onto his desk to begin working on.
What I want to know is who brought all of that information to cubicle 46 and told them to work up the letter? And who gave that person the information?
My guess is that it's the same someone(s) who have been compiling "evidence" of sec violations (take your pick from the many douchebags actively fighting against CYDY's success) and either bombarding this department with information they should be acting on, or they simply handed it over to someone up their chain who has connections within the FDA. Maybe the same person who helped get the unprecedented FDA rebuke published during trading hours. They walked it over and dropped it on the top of some grunt's pile, explaining that it needed to be rushed through because it's covid-related and very dangerous to the public. Drop what you're doing 46, and get this one out right away. Your country is counting on you. I've been asked to provide you with this picture of a bald eagle, this short gif of fighter jets flying over the Dallas Cowboys stadium, a usb stick full of songs about F-150's, and a 4-pack of Monster Energy drinks to aid you in your efforts. Roll tide, son.
In the end though, it's just more horseshit. It's a warning letter that many other companies receive on what is probably a regular basis. Cytodyn gets to respond and that could result in absolutely nothing happening. Or they may have to issue a retraction and make sure the 2,000 people who watched the proactive video are notified.
When someone dies you have to publish publicly that they've passed so that any potential creditors have a chance to make a claim against the estate. It has to stay up for five days, or something. So what do you do? You post in a local newspaper, wait your required days, and then move on because nobody notices or cares. I can envision something like that happening in the Oregonian, or whatever hipster name they have for their local newsrag.
"Investors may have noticed in Cytodyn's Proactive Video on X/X/XX that former CEO Nadar Pourhassan misspoke when discussing Cytodyn's drug candidate Leronlimab as it pertains to Covid-19 treatment. At this time, Leronlimab is still in trials to prove its efficacy, and not approved for treating Covid-19 patients with any level of disease severity. Any suggestion otherwise was made in error by our former CEO and we regret any confusion. If you or someone you know should get sick with Covid-19 the FDA requires us to remind you that you just need to take Remdesivir and you'll be safe. Roll tide."
Clearly whoever has been engaged in discussions with us has agreed to do so despite Nader flashing three fingers on occasion. I'm not worried about this letter. To me it's not indicative of any sort of new or increased pressure from the FDA against Cytodyn, but rather continued bullshit that we're already aware of. The FDA is huge. This isn't traveling around from one department to the next. It's just one guy in one department cranking out some work that no other department is going to be aware of unless they go searching. And why would they? They're too busy jerking off into the free Remdesivir golf towels they got as a thank you for saving the world.
(20)
(0)