Bingo, Tech Guru. Your post asks exactly the qu

Bingo, Tech Guru.

Your post asks exactly the questions we'd all like answers to -- and you could throw in one about the status of the Long Hauler trial, which was supposed to begin in January, and another one about the status of the HIV BLA applications, which was supposed to be completed in Q1 22, which ends in 39 days.

But your post also points out the absurd argument of those who basically shrug off the deafening silence since Jan. 13th as "bad results" or "no results."

For them to be right, the NASH 700mg trial would have to have worse results than the 350mg trial -- something which has never happened in any Leron trial.

And for them to be right, there would also have to be no further results from the mTNBC trial, even though the results 3 months ago still didn't include an EXACT mOS, because more than half the patients were still surviving at that time.

And for them to be right, there would also have be no further news from Brazil -- a mere 62 (I think it was) patients could not be enrolled yet, even though the pandemic worsened drastically there in early January and Albert Einstein has upped the number of participating hospitals to 32 (I think it was), and anyone with any sense would see that trial, with 4 doses beginning with an IV, as dead sure to have better results vs. Covid than any therapeutic ever tested.

And for them to be right, there would have to be no further movement in any direction of the LH trial protocol, and no chance that we might be closer in submitting the HIV BLA.

People who claim that there's no news because it's all bad news are basing their guess on a whole crew of unlikely propositions.

No, this is a silent period. Period.