Thank you for the reply. I agree that what you say
Post# of 153999
(Total Views: 476)
Posted On: 02/19/2022 9:49:14 AM
Thank you for the reply. I agree that what you say is very possible. If it is a partnership I just hope that the upfront money for a blockbuster is well over 100 million. Otherwise, IMHO, where pps is concerned only those holding many shares would benefit in the short-term. Long-term is quite different. The opinions kind of differ according to number of shares owned.
What I suggested without any certainty whatsoever was nothing more than pondering another scenario. Although covid revenue would probably not be anywhere near what it could have been, it could still bring in enough revenue to negate having to make a bad deal. If you believe trials will be successful, you stay quiet & wait(no law about answering requests for information, is there?). If not, you make the best deal you can & quick.
Personally, I believe Brazil trials are going well, cancer patients are still surviving & LL will blow SOC for cancer out of the water. I further believe, that given time, HIV BLA will be successfully submitted, that LH's is a no-brainer.
Popular sentiment is that partnership would be for NASH. If said partner brought in "their people", to which indications would funds be directed?
Just throwing it out there.
What I suggested without any certainty whatsoever was nothing more than pondering another scenario. Although covid revenue would probably not be anywhere near what it could have been, it could still bring in enough revenue to negate having to make a bad deal. If you believe trials will be successful, you stay quiet & wait(no law about answering requests for information, is there?). If not, you make the best deal you can & quick.
Personally, I believe Brazil trials are going well, cancer patients are still surviving & LL will blow SOC for cancer out of the water. I further believe, that given time, HIV BLA will be successfully submitted, that LH's is a no-brainer.
Popular sentiment is that partnership would be for NASH. If said partner brought in "their people", to which indications would funds be directed?
Just throwing it out there.
(4)
(0)