HUGE: Durham Dominoes Drop, BOMBSHELL Findings
Post# of 123474
(Total Views: 235)
Posted On: 02/16/2022 11:51:33 AM
HUGE: Durham Dominoes Drop, BOMBSHELL Findings
Trump was absolutely right! The Durham dominoes are dropping, and no, this is not looking good for Hillary!
Apparently, there were lawyers representing the Clinton team that paid a technology firm to “infiltrate” servers that belonged to Trump Tower, and later the White House when “45” was occupying it in order to establish a “narrative” and “inference” to bring some evidence to government agencies in a shameless attempt to link Donald Trump to Russia, according to a filing from Special Counsel John Durham.
Durham filed this motion on February 11th, and it was focused on the potential conflicts of interest when it comes to former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, who incidentally has now been charged with making false statements to a federal agent. Sussmann is pleading not guilty in that case.
This indictment against Sussmann claimed that he told then-FBI General Counsel James Baker in September 2016 (all of two months before the 2016 Presidential Election, no less) that he wasn’t employed and doing any type of legal work “for any client” when he had requested and was granted a meeting where he presented the “purported data and ‘white papers’ that allegedly demonstrated a convert communications channel’ before Trump’s organization and the Kremlin-linked Alfa Bank.
However, Durham’s filing on February 11th has a section entitled “Factual Background” that reveals that Sussmann “had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign.”
It also should be noted that Sussmann had repeatedly billed the Clinton campaign for this work.
The filing has also revealed that Sussman and these tech executives clandestinely met and communicated with another law partner, who incidentally was serving as the General Counsel of the Clinton campaign. Sources told Fox News that the lawyer in question is Mark Elias, who is most known for working at the law firm Perkins Coie.
Durham’s filing is stating that it was in July 2016 that the tech executive working with Sussman had retained a U.S. investigative firm retained by the first law firm on behalf of the Clinton campaign and several other interested parties to “assemble the purported data and white papers.”
“In connection with these efforts, Tech Executive-1 exploited his access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data,” the filing states. “Tech Executive-1 also enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract.”
“Tech Executive-1 tasked these researchers to mine Internet data to establish ‘an inference’ and ‘narrative’ tying then-candidate Trump to Russia,” Durham states. “In doing so, Tech Executive-1 indicated that he was seeking to please certain ‘VIPs,’ referring to individuals at Law Firm-1 and the Clinton campaign.”
Durham also mentioned in his filing that it will be during Sussmann’s trial that the government is going to attempt to establish that among the internet the first tech executive and his associates exploited the domain name system (DNS) and all of the internet traffic pertaining to “(i) a particular healthcare provider, (ii) Trump Tower, (iii) Donald Trump’s Central Park West apartment building, and (iv) the Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP)” when Trump was in charge.
Durham noted in is filing that the internet company that the first tech executive worked for “had come to access and maintain dedicated servers” for the Executive Office of the President as “part of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided DNS resolution services to the EOP.”
“Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump,” Durham states.
The filing also reveals that Sussmann provided “an updated set of allegations” including the Russian bank data, and additional allegations relating to Trump “to a second agency of the U.S. government” in 2017.
To make matters worse for Hillary, Durham said that the allegations “relied, in part, on the purported DNS traffic” as a means to attempt to smear Trump with these Russian collusion allegations.
In Sussmann’s meeting with the second U.S. government agency, Durham says he “provided data which he claimed reflected purportedly suspicious DNS lookups by these entities of internet protocol (IP) addresses affiliated with a Russian mobile phone provider,” and claimed that the lookups “demonstrated Trump and/or his associates were using supposedly rare, Russian-made wireless phones in the vicinity of the White House and other locations.”
Another thing to keep in mind would be the lookups from these Russian sources. Durham is noting in his report that the data collected by the first tech executive does not prove that the lookups were wholly from the Trump team, and that during the time Trump was in office there were at least three million Russian lookups, and only a thousand of them were devoted to the Trump team.
Moreover, these Russian lookups began in 2014-as early as the previous Obama Administration-and that was another “fact that they omitted”, according to Durham’s filing.
“In his meeting with Agency-2 employees, the defendant also made a substantially similar false statement as he made to the FBI General Counsel,” Durham wrote. “In particular, the defendant asserted that he was not representing a particular client in conveying the above allegations.”
“In truth and in fact, the defendant was representing Tech Executive-1–a fact the defendant subsequently acknowledged under oath in December 2017 testimony before Congress, without identifying the client by name,” Durham wrote.
Former President Trump reacted to the filing on Saturday evening, saying Durham’s filing “provides indisputable evidence that my campaign and presidency were spied on by operatives paid by the Hillary Clinton Campaign in an effort to develop a completely fabricated connection to Russia.” Trump has been vindicated, and Trump was absolutely right.
“This is a scandal far greater in scope and magnitude than Watergate and those who were involved in and knew about this spying operation should be subject to criminal prosecution,” Trump said. “In a stronger period of time in our country, this crime would have been punishable by death.”
Trump added: “In addition, reparations should be paid to those in our country who have been damaged by this.”
Kash Patel, Former chief investigator of the Trump-Russia probe for the House Intelligence Committee under then-Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., described this filing as “definitively shows that the Hillary Clinton campaign directly funded and ordered its lawyers at Perkins Coie to orchestrate a criminal enterprise to fabricate a connection between President Trump and Russia.”
Patel is also claiming that this arrangement was put in place as early as July 2016 and was nothing but a shameless attempt to infiltrate the Trump Presidential Campaign, the Trump Tower, and his Central Park West apartment building.
The anti-Trump dossier was commissioned by ex-British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, and it was commissioned by the opposition research firm Fusion GPS and that in turn was funded by the DNC and the Hillary Clinton campaign through the Perkins Coie law firm.
Patel also described how Sussmann had relayed the “false narrative” to U.S. government agencies “in the hopes of having them launch investigations of President Trump.”
Sussman’s indictment is the second one to come out of the Durham probe. The first one was Kevin Clinesmith, who was charged with making a false statement for claiming that he was “not a source” for any other government agency. He actually altered an email in claiming this as well.
Former Attorney General Bill Barr appointed Durham, then a U.S. attorney from Connecticut in 2019 to investigate the origins of the original Russia probe by the FBI. Most notably, Mueller’s team found no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion with the Russians to influence the 2016 U.S. Presidential campaign. Thus, yet more evidence that yes, Trump was absolutely right.
https://patriotunitednews.com/breaking-durham...d%20Handed
Trump was absolutely right! The Durham dominoes are dropping, and no, this is not looking good for Hillary!
Apparently, there were lawyers representing the Clinton team that paid a technology firm to “infiltrate” servers that belonged to Trump Tower, and later the White House when “45” was occupying it in order to establish a “narrative” and “inference” to bring some evidence to government agencies in a shameless attempt to link Donald Trump to Russia, according to a filing from Special Counsel John Durham.
Durham filed this motion on February 11th, and it was focused on the potential conflicts of interest when it comes to former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, who incidentally has now been charged with making false statements to a federal agent. Sussmann is pleading not guilty in that case.
This indictment against Sussmann claimed that he told then-FBI General Counsel James Baker in September 2016 (all of two months before the 2016 Presidential Election, no less) that he wasn’t employed and doing any type of legal work “for any client” when he had requested and was granted a meeting where he presented the “purported data and ‘white papers’ that allegedly demonstrated a convert communications channel’ before Trump’s organization and the Kremlin-linked Alfa Bank.
However, Durham’s filing on February 11th has a section entitled “Factual Background” that reveals that Sussmann “had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign.”
It also should be noted that Sussmann had repeatedly billed the Clinton campaign for this work.
The filing has also revealed that Sussman and these tech executives clandestinely met and communicated with another law partner, who incidentally was serving as the General Counsel of the Clinton campaign. Sources told Fox News that the lawyer in question is Mark Elias, who is most known for working at the law firm Perkins Coie.
Durham’s filing is stating that it was in July 2016 that the tech executive working with Sussman had retained a U.S. investigative firm retained by the first law firm on behalf of the Clinton campaign and several other interested parties to “assemble the purported data and white papers.”
“In connection with these efforts, Tech Executive-1 exploited his access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data,” the filing states. “Tech Executive-1 also enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract.”
“Tech Executive-1 tasked these researchers to mine Internet data to establish ‘an inference’ and ‘narrative’ tying then-candidate Trump to Russia,” Durham states. “In doing so, Tech Executive-1 indicated that he was seeking to please certain ‘VIPs,’ referring to individuals at Law Firm-1 and the Clinton campaign.”
Durham also mentioned in his filing that it will be during Sussmann’s trial that the government is going to attempt to establish that among the internet the first tech executive and his associates exploited the domain name system (DNS) and all of the internet traffic pertaining to “(i) a particular healthcare provider, (ii) Trump Tower, (iii) Donald Trump’s Central Park West apartment building, and (iv) the Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP)” when Trump was in charge.
Durham noted in is filing that the internet company that the first tech executive worked for “had come to access and maintain dedicated servers” for the Executive Office of the President as “part of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided DNS resolution services to the EOP.”
“Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump,” Durham states.
The filing also reveals that Sussmann provided “an updated set of allegations” including the Russian bank data, and additional allegations relating to Trump “to a second agency of the U.S. government” in 2017.
To make matters worse for Hillary, Durham said that the allegations “relied, in part, on the purported DNS traffic” as a means to attempt to smear Trump with these Russian collusion allegations.
In Sussmann’s meeting with the second U.S. government agency, Durham says he “provided data which he claimed reflected purportedly suspicious DNS lookups by these entities of internet protocol (IP) addresses affiliated with a Russian mobile phone provider,” and claimed that the lookups “demonstrated Trump and/or his associates were using supposedly rare, Russian-made wireless phones in the vicinity of the White House and other locations.”
Another thing to keep in mind would be the lookups from these Russian sources. Durham is noting in his report that the data collected by the first tech executive does not prove that the lookups were wholly from the Trump team, and that during the time Trump was in office there were at least three million Russian lookups, and only a thousand of them were devoted to the Trump team.
Moreover, these Russian lookups began in 2014-as early as the previous Obama Administration-and that was another “fact that they omitted”, according to Durham’s filing.
“In his meeting with Agency-2 employees, the defendant also made a substantially similar false statement as he made to the FBI General Counsel,” Durham wrote. “In particular, the defendant asserted that he was not representing a particular client in conveying the above allegations.”
“In truth and in fact, the defendant was representing Tech Executive-1–a fact the defendant subsequently acknowledged under oath in December 2017 testimony before Congress, without identifying the client by name,” Durham wrote.
Former President Trump reacted to the filing on Saturday evening, saying Durham’s filing “provides indisputable evidence that my campaign and presidency were spied on by operatives paid by the Hillary Clinton Campaign in an effort to develop a completely fabricated connection to Russia.” Trump has been vindicated, and Trump was absolutely right.
“This is a scandal far greater in scope and magnitude than Watergate and those who were involved in and knew about this spying operation should be subject to criminal prosecution,” Trump said. “In a stronger period of time in our country, this crime would have been punishable by death.”
Trump added: “In addition, reparations should be paid to those in our country who have been damaged by this.”
Kash Patel, Former chief investigator of the Trump-Russia probe for the House Intelligence Committee under then-Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., described this filing as “definitively shows that the Hillary Clinton campaign directly funded and ordered its lawyers at Perkins Coie to orchestrate a criminal enterprise to fabricate a connection between President Trump and Russia.”
Patel is also claiming that this arrangement was put in place as early as July 2016 and was nothing but a shameless attempt to infiltrate the Trump Presidential Campaign, the Trump Tower, and his Central Park West apartment building.
The anti-Trump dossier was commissioned by ex-British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, and it was commissioned by the opposition research firm Fusion GPS and that in turn was funded by the DNC and the Hillary Clinton campaign through the Perkins Coie law firm.
Patel also described how Sussmann had relayed the “false narrative” to U.S. government agencies “in the hopes of having them launch investigations of President Trump.”
Sussman’s indictment is the second one to come out of the Durham probe. The first one was Kevin Clinesmith, who was charged with making a false statement for claiming that he was “not a source” for any other government agency. He actually altered an email in claiming this as well.
Former Attorney General Bill Barr appointed Durham, then a U.S. attorney from Connecticut in 2019 to investigate the origins of the original Russia probe by the FBI. Most notably, Mueller’s team found no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion with the Russians to influence the 2016 U.S. Presidential campaign. Thus, yet more evidence that yes, Trump was absolutely right.
https://patriotunitednews.com/breaking-durham...d%20Handed
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼