How is this HIV cure "project" to be classified, a
Post# of 148109
In the past, silence from Nader on a specific trial or indication (like the HIV prep with Thailand red cross) was a good indication something went wrong or was stopped for another reason (e.g. GvHD).
I have no problem with not getting updates every two weeks about any small progress, enrollment or lost emails. What I expect as a shareholder is, to get informed about certain milestones (e.g. enrollment of first and last patient, trial stopped for whatever reason, ...) or other achieved/ received important regulatory decisions.
Make a plan, define milestones, communicate to shareholders, achieve milestones and report to shareholders in a timely manner.
No fluff, no golden quarter or three digits talk, no half backed PRs nobody can understand or interpret except the shorts.
I do not want the NWBO treatment (no news/ information at all), but I would expect professional communication from management on achieved goals or if a trial was stopped or started.