The only other remarks I would add to those by my
Post# of 36566
(Total Views: 466)
Posted On: 01/28/2022 3:31:59 PM
Re: Zolis_onkel #34665
The only other remarks I would add to those by my colleagues (NYD & GMIN) who did a good job responding, are:
As far as NUGX goes, this started back last April, I believe, and inquired on this board who was responsible for initiating this trading. Our dear, dear, friend MMPJOE lashed out at me for even asking, despite the fact that the Pres/CEO/CoB of the company being traded obviously had the authority to make that inquiry and demand the information. That never was done, and there were PRs and a CC in the meantime, in which this information could have been revealed (even if you are a double-secret-probation gag order investigation conspiracy type). The NUGX issue is nothing more than a convenient excuse, and logical analysis completely eliminates that excuse. (If "outside" bad actors were involved, a CEO/Pres/CoB would reassure the shareholders by so advising, and not hide the information. I mean, it is the shareholders' money anyway, and the CoB has a fiduciary obligation to answer the folks who hold the shares. (But that's just me - I guess I'm silly that way.)
What is it that Todd is communicating? Nothing substantive. A trained parrot can do that. I also disagree with your assertion that "the lights are still on;" there's no more office with lights to be turned on or off. Apparently, those were turned off months ago now.
I admit I haven't played the board game Pollyanna for years, but there is no palatable reason for this charade to go on. Everyone who recites the "Joe excuses" simply gives him more time before the piper comes calling for payment...
As far as NUGX goes, this started back last April, I believe, and inquired on this board who was responsible for initiating this trading. Our dear, dear, friend MMPJOE lashed out at me for even asking, despite the fact that the Pres/CEO/CoB of the company being traded obviously had the authority to make that inquiry and demand the information. That never was done, and there were PRs and a CC in the meantime, in which this information could have been revealed (even if you are a double-secret-probation gag order investigation conspiracy type). The NUGX issue is nothing more than a convenient excuse, and logical analysis completely eliminates that excuse. (If "outside" bad actors were involved, a CEO/Pres/CoB would reassure the shareholders by so advising, and not hide the information. I mean, it is the shareholders' money anyway, and the CoB has a fiduciary obligation to answer the folks who hold the shares. (But that's just me - I guess I'm silly that way.)
What is it that Todd is communicating? Nothing substantive. A trained parrot can do that. I also disagree with your assertion that "the lights are still on;" there's no more office with lights to be turned on or off. Apparently, those were turned off months ago now.
I admit I haven't played the board game Pollyanna for years, but there is no palatable reason for this charade to go on. Everyone who recites the "Joe excuses" simply gives him more time before the piper comes calling for payment...
(4)
(1)