Struck a nerve? ...with my previous post. Ohh
Post# of 11035
Ohh I'm sorry...did I offend you Janice and Co? Are you worried about something I said?
FED Conference TOMORROW!!!! GAME CHANGER!!! Decisions Decisions...(maybe a slight delay or maybe it will be instant)?
Interest rates increase? Which is anticipated and welcomed btw...
What is not welcomed is the volume of "Broker DEBT" that must be dealt with......Margin Calls coming??? Wonder how much is that interest rate hike going to be? .25% or more?
I guess we will have to wait and see if anything happens. All I know is the next 8 weeks are going to be absolutely bonkers in the market. Pay attention to that volatility! "Order imbalances" and "Share imbalances" What will they do? LOL!
Lots of cheddar is going to be needed to make the market go up...Where are they going to get the money from? Shorty? Brokers are going to be fighting each other like peronna's sensing blood in the river.
or Will the market drop it like its HOT?
The WAR of our lifetime has begun! Bulls vs Bears!
ASSET VALUES WILL RISE!!!
I wonder if those CRGP Financials will show ASSETS???
If I could frame this post I would. Jsep...You killed it! On Point! Bravo!!!
jseps0036 Tuesday, 01/25/22 06:03:20 PM
Re: markh957 post# 52433 0
Post #
52436
of 52440
You are thinking correctly in your assessment and have done the raw market cap calculations properly based off what is known.
However, part of the allure with CRGP is what we don’t know about the shares structure. All the evidence via court rulings indicates there are some big questions about how many legitimate shares are out there and who possesses them. Is there really 900M outstanding? If so, how many are possessed by insiders/associates? How many shares are actually available to trade (the float)?
There is also a strong likelihood that brokers do not actually possess the shares that have been credited to client accounts and they are hoping that clients sell prior to ever having to address this. This type of situation would result in DEBT on the books of brokers. Ordinarily, this is a risk they can tolerate, but if margin interest rates rise, brokers may be put into a situation of needing to “cover”…or put up more collateral liquidity/cash. Also, there is a chance that Calissio is actually a private business now and that there is a desire to come off the public markets. If so, this would include a buyout price to have all the shares returned. This type of situation could be problematic for brokers that never bought client shares in the first place. It would likely create a “float rotation” that would progressively surge the price upwards in order for brokers to clear their books.
So, even if the eventual market cap only supports a PPS of .03-.10 cents, the potential for the previously mentioned float rotation is what could cause this to really take off.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=167636705
$13 (Time for a CHANGE)
$CRGP
#USA
![Like This Post](/images/thumb-up.png)
![Dislike This Post](/images/thumb-down.png)
Calissio Resources Group, Inc. (CRGP) Stock Research Links
"The Preamble
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Oath
"I solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America"
The Flag
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
![qpnycangel.png](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2022/5/7/qpnycangel.png)
![fdw[fAmerica_Soldier_Flag.png](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2022/5/7/fdw[fAmerica_Soldier_Flag.png)
Quote:
If the broker-dealer fails to deliver for 13 days, the regulation imposes a “close out” duty to purchase and deliver securities “of like kind and quantity.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/20...ify%20wall
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/m...v-manning/