Sidley saved our company from hostility. Former em
Post# of 148278
(Total Views: 943)
Posted On: 01/15/2022 7:03:39 PM
Sidley saved our company from hostility. Former employee assigning Amarex; the false Prostate test from Pastell. Dr. Pattentson trying to patent the obvious. A proxy vote that was planned before it was made public: (Reddit moderator superChet being Beaty is proof.)
Ambulance chasers, sudden Ivermectin hype with false data to take away from Philippines hype. (Which btw is now being linked to Liver failure). HELLO NASH!
Manipulators: Failed patent hijacking. Failed proxy vote, failed appeal. Not allowing an audit to now potentially ruining NSFs reputation. Their lives are a failure and will be.
We are facing: Dark money. Manipulators selling and buying less than 1% of the total volume. Shorting. Even synthetic shares to bring down the SP.
When I recently bought a large lump sum on 2 separate occasions, I saw the ASK wall get taken down immediately. And Before the next wall was filled, it didn’t process.
The ask wall was almost torn down, and they kept adding shares to the same ask as my bid suddenly was shown to support the old wall I had just broken down
Why?
Because someone manipulated the price after I brought it up.
So I quickly cancelled the order, then broke down the next ASK and the graph started to spike until they manipulated it again and put another wall. Eventually my order was filled and it was like my buy didn’t do anything.
They do this so our company is FORCED to dilute.
It’s in the companies best interest to fight back and also make sure our drug is used to max potential for the patients.
We have to understand: Some things are said to improve a lawyers position in court, some things are said for investors to relax.
The 10Q:
“The Company believes that material uncertainties related to the ultimate regulatory approval of leronlimab for commercial sale have been significantly reduced”
This tells us that something big is possible. That’s for investors.
I know some are upset about the SP and don’t want to be told by Nader to chill. But honestly, he’s right. He only gets all the blame and anger bc of the manipulation.
We aren’t able to enjoy knowing we saved lives.
Possible patients like myself aren’t able to enjoy a Long Hauler free life.
Investors aren’t able to enjoy their investment.
But in reality, we have a molecule that can change the world with a domino of indications ready to fall in place.
Break down:
“In order to obtain the bond, the Company will be required to tender $6.5 million in cash as collateral to the surety issuing the bond. IF NECESSARY, the Company will seek an extension of the deadline for posting the bond."
This is what we know:
Nader does NOT like dilution.
No where in this statement does it say they can’t come up with the money.
It’s read as if necessary we can push back the date. That’s it.
The manipulators are controlling the narrative by making you think we can’t come up with the money.
So, WHY dilute the company if the company feels regulatory APPROVAL has been significantly reduced?
We may just be simply pushing the date back to let whatever is pending or will be pending materialize.
We may be experiencing the up part of it soon.
Here’s why:
We owe Samsung ex amount of money.
They wrote it so it can be read as the Samsung relationship isn’t strained. In fact, it’s a STRONG relationship. The words “commercially reasonable efforts” can be interpreted many ways:
Is it “as long as you guys submit your paperwork for commercial usage, we are good on the contract if you primarily keep dealing with us.”
Is it: “just get caught up on the December payment and then we can wing your January payment until Feb. etc”
Is it: “we want to work with you and as long as you show us you care about our relationship, and make reasonable commercial progress, we might even partner up with you.”
The bears are LOUDER. Creatures in the wild get loud when they’re scared. Its no longer repetition to manipulate its LOUD SCREAMS TO GET US OUT ASAP.
It’s a perfect set up for a short squeeze that will start that rollercoaster and they know it. They will just claim longs are paid or outright dumb.
But this Samsung situation strengthens our position in court. We had our backs against the wall, and not paying Samsung on time is proof, your honor.
Say we get a regulatory approval and this lawsuit is pending the way it is. Now we don’t have our backs against the wall and NSF wouldn’t be off the hook for a botched 3 to 1 age stratification issue, or incorrect dates that changed a trials outcome in statistical significance. Or Amarex for negligence of the BLA. + Whatever damages they may have done.
THIS IS WHY Nader sent the email to hurry up and get the BLA submitted. For proof of negligence. An audit isn’t even needed for that, it’s just needed to see HOW MUCH damage they did.
Don’t underestimate SIDLEY. They have things in the bag before it even starts.
Ambulance chasers, sudden Ivermectin hype with false data to take away from Philippines hype. (Which btw is now being linked to Liver failure). HELLO NASH!
Manipulators: Failed patent hijacking. Failed proxy vote, failed appeal. Not allowing an audit to now potentially ruining NSFs reputation. Their lives are a failure and will be.
We are facing: Dark money. Manipulators selling and buying less than 1% of the total volume. Shorting. Even synthetic shares to bring down the SP.
When I recently bought a large lump sum on 2 separate occasions, I saw the ASK wall get taken down immediately. And Before the next wall was filled, it didn’t process.
The ask wall was almost torn down, and they kept adding shares to the same ask as my bid suddenly was shown to support the old wall I had just broken down
Why?
Because someone manipulated the price after I brought it up.
So I quickly cancelled the order, then broke down the next ASK and the graph started to spike until they manipulated it again and put another wall. Eventually my order was filled and it was like my buy didn’t do anything.
They do this so our company is FORCED to dilute.
It’s in the companies best interest to fight back and also make sure our drug is used to max potential for the patients.
We have to understand: Some things are said to improve a lawyers position in court, some things are said for investors to relax.
The 10Q:
“The Company believes that material uncertainties related to the ultimate regulatory approval of leronlimab for commercial sale have been significantly reduced”
This tells us that something big is possible. That’s for investors.
I know some are upset about the SP and don’t want to be told by Nader to chill. But honestly, he’s right. He only gets all the blame and anger bc of the manipulation.
We aren’t able to enjoy knowing we saved lives.
Possible patients like myself aren’t able to enjoy a Long Hauler free life.
Investors aren’t able to enjoy their investment.
But in reality, we have a molecule that can change the world with a domino of indications ready to fall in place.
Break down:
“In order to obtain the bond, the Company will be required to tender $6.5 million in cash as collateral to the surety issuing the bond. IF NECESSARY, the Company will seek an extension of the deadline for posting the bond."
This is what we know:
Nader does NOT like dilution.
No where in this statement does it say they can’t come up with the money.
It’s read as if necessary we can push back the date. That’s it.
The manipulators are controlling the narrative by making you think we can’t come up with the money.
So, WHY dilute the company if the company feels regulatory APPROVAL has been significantly reduced?
We may just be simply pushing the date back to let whatever is pending or will be pending materialize.
We may be experiencing the up part of it soon.
Here’s why:
We owe Samsung ex amount of money.
They wrote it so it can be read as the Samsung relationship isn’t strained. In fact, it’s a STRONG relationship. The words “commercially reasonable efforts” can be interpreted many ways:
Is it “as long as you guys submit your paperwork for commercial usage, we are good on the contract if you primarily keep dealing with us.”
Is it: “just get caught up on the December payment and then we can wing your January payment until Feb. etc”
Is it: “we want to work with you and as long as you show us you care about our relationship, and make reasonable commercial progress, we might even partner up with you.”
The bears are LOUDER. Creatures in the wild get loud when they’re scared. Its no longer repetition to manipulate its LOUD SCREAMS TO GET US OUT ASAP.
It’s a perfect set up for a short squeeze that will start that rollercoaster and they know it. They will just claim longs are paid or outright dumb.
But this Samsung situation strengthens our position in court. We had our backs against the wall, and not paying Samsung on time is proof, your honor.
Say we get a regulatory approval and this lawsuit is pending the way it is. Now we don’t have our backs against the wall and NSF wouldn’t be off the hook for a botched 3 to 1 age stratification issue, or incorrect dates that changed a trials outcome in statistical significance. Or Amarex for negligence of the BLA. + Whatever damages they may have done.
THIS IS WHY Nader sent the email to hurry up and get the BLA submitted. For proof of negligence. An audit isn’t even needed for that, it’s just needed to see HOW MUCH damage they did.
Don’t underestimate SIDLEY. They have things in the bag before it even starts.
(16)
(0)CytoDyn Inc (CYDY) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼