My response to a gent on Reddit who labeled me a b
Post# of 153986
(Total Views: 572)
Posted On: 01/09/2022 3:07:13 PM
My response to a gent on Reddit who labeled me a bad investor for loosing money by investing in CYDY, and for not being more diversified....
Dear Good Investor Diversified Man: It is evident that investors, much more experienced than I, much more sophisticated than I, who believe strongly in the science and MOA of leronlimab, took substantially strong positions in Cytodyn, contrary to their general investing practices and patterns, and they also, subsequently realized large losses (on paper and/or by selling). It is not nearly as simple as to say, "Don't blame the FDA or Cytodyn for the simple fact you didn't stay diversified". That is a judgemental, classic, cliche response to the massive corruption in high places and to he illegal, immoral massive shorting that occurs in the stock market today and is based upon only partial knowledge of all the circumstances. True, broader diversification would have lead to less losses for me. I decide upon my risk management, estimating reward to risk ratios, but "MASSIVE shorting and MASSIVE corruption" were not the strongest influence upon my reward to risk ratio estimation, and apparently, they should have been. Cytodyn was the #1 volume trading stock in 2020, why? I would suggest that Cytodyn has set several records for volume being shorted, and aggresive articles (Citadel, Adam Fartstein) attacking the company with fradulent lies.
Dear Good Investor Diversified Man: It is evident that investors, much more experienced than I, much more sophisticated than I, who believe strongly in the science and MOA of leronlimab, took substantially strong positions in Cytodyn, contrary to their general investing practices and patterns, and they also, subsequently realized large losses (on paper and/or by selling). It is not nearly as simple as to say, "Don't blame the FDA or Cytodyn for the simple fact you didn't stay diversified". That is a judgemental, classic, cliche response to the massive corruption in high places and to he illegal, immoral massive shorting that occurs in the stock market today and is based upon only partial knowledge of all the circumstances. True, broader diversification would have lead to less losses for me. I decide upon my risk management, estimating reward to risk ratios, but "MASSIVE shorting and MASSIVE corruption" were not the strongest influence upon my reward to risk ratio estimation, and apparently, they should have been. Cytodyn was the #1 volume trading stock in 2020, why? I would suggest that Cytodyn has set several records for volume being shorted, and aggresive articles (Citadel, Adam Fartstein) attacking the company with fradulent lies.
(8)
(0)