I very much appreciate your intelligent post, as it allows us to show where we differ on some things. In the end, we ALL want CYDY and leronlimab to be successful, it's just a matter of how we get there.
I don't think that the run-up from $1 to $10 was simply a pump and dump as you put it. Nader IS responsible when he makes comments about how well something is going or when something will get done and how good it looks, and investors act on it. He IS the only source of information and thus should understand that responsibility.
You are correct, Nader is running the company the same way at $.30 as at any other price, and that is to say he pumps it like a smiling buffoon, waving 3 fingers, and he cannot figure out how to get 50 people in a trial in Brazil that has tens of thousands of sick people. Still over-promising and under-delivering as usual.
No third party is failing to see what leronlimab may be worth, but they ARE seeing what it is worth in the hands of someone who has failed to deliver on the drug's promise time and time again. Is that really not clear by now? I AGREE with you and would be pissed to sell for $1-2, however NP has not proven he can create value for the past 3 years at least. Now, $2 is almost 3x the current SP. So sad!
OF COURSE NP is well aware of the current share price and without a doubt, this "challenge" could have been avoided if he had assembled more of a team that knew what it was doing and could help him as he is not skilled in these areas. That is a failure of leadership. It would be a challenge for me to represent someone in a capital murder case, because that is not what I do, not what I have any experience doing. But I could make myself more proficient and also employ people who could help me to do a better job. Yes, maybe Recknor is that guy, but is it too little too late? The money is running out and we have zero leverage now. Time is not on our side.
I don't think that the run-up from $1 to $10 was simply a pump and dump as you put it. Nader IS responsible when he makes comments about how well something is going or when something will get done and how good it looks, and investors act on it. He IS the only source of information and thus should understand that responsibility.
You are correct, Nader is running the company the same way at $.30 as at any other price, and that is to say he pumps it like a smiling buffoon, waving 3 fingers, and he cannot figure out how to get 50 people in a trial in Brazil that has tens of thousands of sick people. Still over-promising and under-delivering as usual.
No third party is failing to see what leronlimab may be worth, but they ARE seeing what it is worth in the hands of someone who has failed to deliver on the drug's promise time and time again. Is that really not clear by now? I AGREE with you and would be pissed to sell for $1-2, however NP has not proven he can create value for the past 3 years at least. Now, $2 is almost 3x the current SP. So sad!
OF COURSE NP is well aware of the current share price and without a doubt, this "challenge" could have been avoided if he had assembled more of a team that knew what it was doing and could help him as he is not skilled in these areas. That is a failure of leadership. It would be a challenge for me to represent someone in a capital murder case, because that is not what I do, not what I have any experience doing. But I could make myself more proficient and also employ people who could help me to do a better job. Yes, maybe Recknor is that guy, but is it too little too late? The money is running out and we have zero leverage now. Time is not on our side.
2
