PLEADINGS FROM SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Post# of 154118
(Total Views: 612)
Posted On: 01/07/2022 5:34:43 PM
PLEADINGS FROM SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ON JANUARY 7, 2022"
In August of 2021, the CDC changed the definition of “vaccination” from “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease” to “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection to a specific disease.”
However, this newly created CDC definition conflicts with the statutory criteria for a vaccine, which focuses solely upon immunity. In 1986, Congress passed42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1, which established “a National Vaccine Program to achieve
optimal prevention of human infectious diseases through immunization
. . .”(emphasis added). Clearly, from both a public health standpoint as well as from alegal standpoint, immunization is the intended
sine qua non
of vaccination.Since they do not create immunity, but are claimed to merely reduce the symptoms of the disease, the so called Covid-19 vaccines are treatments, not vaccines.
Even the FDA has classified them as “CBER-Regulated Biologics”otherwise known as “therapeutics” which fall under the “Coronavirus Treatment Acceleration Program".
Universal principles of virology and immunology teach us that immunity from natural infection is the most complete, most robust, and most durable.
Consistent with this principle, the evidence establishes that natural immunity acquired by those who have been infected with and recovered from Covid-19 (the“Covid-19 Recovered”) acquire complete and lifelong immunity.
Indeed, The Cleveland Clinic found the following: “Individuals who have had SARS-CoV-2infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination.”
In August of 2021, the CDC changed the definition of “vaccination” from “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease” to “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection to a specific disease.”
However, this newly created CDC definition conflicts with the statutory criteria for a vaccine, which focuses solely upon immunity. In 1986, Congress passed42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1, which established “a National Vaccine Program to achieve
optimal prevention of human infectious diseases through immunization
. . .”(emphasis added). Clearly, from both a public health standpoint as well as from alegal standpoint, immunization is the intended
sine qua non
of vaccination.Since they do not create immunity, but are claimed to merely reduce the symptoms of the disease, the so called Covid-19 vaccines are treatments, not vaccines.
Even the FDA has classified them as “CBER-Regulated Biologics”otherwise known as “therapeutics” which fall under the “Coronavirus Treatment Acceleration Program".
Universal principles of virology and immunology teach us that immunity from natural infection is the most complete, most robust, and most durable.
Consistent with this principle, the evidence establishes that natural immunity acquired by those who have been infected with and recovered from Covid-19 (the“Covid-19 Recovered”) acquire complete and lifelong immunity.
Indeed, The Cleveland Clinic found the following: “Individuals who have had SARS-CoV-2infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination.”
(5)
(0)