Explain this to me… why would anyone think we need a partner? If we had a partner in a big Pharma company wouldn’t they help filing our approvals? Should they come in and steal our thunder after we get the hard work done? Steal our thunder? Is this what you would want from a partner?
Distribution seems easy enough and after our first approval our first sale will pay for any needed advertising that we needed. What are the other reasons we would give up half of our revenue or more for? When we can have a distributor and advertise on our own. Didn’t we just hire a great advertising company?
I know that I don’t want to split revenue with anyone ever for any reason because we can do everything on our own. This talk of partners is BS and is just plain the wrong direction to go. We are already hiring former Department Vice-Presidents of Big Pharma. With revenue we will hire all we need to progress our little company into a Goliath in the industry of Big Pharma. Of coarse a partner could slow us down and take many years to do what we could do in a year or so working by ourselves and hiring the right people. Getting a partner might just be a very negative slow play to have. Maybe our partner takes control and the money train stops completely? The lack of actual benefits could outweigh any experience we get from a partner.
Paying top dollar for the best in the industry leaders sounds much more like what we have been doing lately. Why change our pattern? When you want the best you pay that little bit more to get them… finding a true BIG PHARMA CEO will be our biggest job after revenue starts. Nader already said he would take a lesser roll and step down when the approval happens. We are getting very close now. I don’t want any stinking partner(s) for any indications or all indications. Because more than likely you won’t be able to separate the indications. You will just get half of our potential if the partner doesn’t realize right away it should just buy us out and screw us all out of the big money. It’s always nice to consider all options… but the ones that screw us isn’t top on my list. Let’s just become a Goliath company on our own. We got this!
Distribution seems easy enough and after our first approval our first sale will pay for any needed advertising that we needed. What are the other reasons we would give up half of our revenue or more for? When we can have a distributor and advertise on our own. Didn’t we just hire a great advertising company?
I know that I don’t want to split revenue with anyone ever for any reason because we can do everything on our own. This talk of partners is BS and is just plain the wrong direction to go. We are already hiring former Department Vice-Presidents of Big Pharma. With revenue we will hire all we need to progress our little company into a Goliath in the industry of Big Pharma. Of coarse a partner could slow us down and take many years to do what we could do in a year or so working by ourselves and hiring the right people. Getting a partner might just be a very negative slow play to have. Maybe our partner takes control and the money train stops completely? The lack of actual benefits could outweigh any experience we get from a partner.
Paying top dollar for the best in the industry leaders sounds much more like what we have been doing lately. Why change our pattern? When you want the best you pay that little bit more to get them… finding a true BIG PHARMA CEO will be our biggest job after revenue starts. Nader already said he would take a lesser roll and step down when the approval happens. We are getting very close now. I don’t want any stinking partner(s) for any indications or all indications. Because more than likely you won’t be able to separate the indications. You will just get half of our potential if the partner doesn’t realize right away it should just buy us out and screw us all out of the big money. It’s always nice to consider all options… but the ones that screw us isn’t top on my list. Let’s just become a Goliath company on our own. We got this!
5
1
