Slight correction to your post. You note zero side

Slight correction to your post. You note zero side effects, but during the meeting it was mentioned that people taking the drug that had other issues like joint pain seemed to be feeling better along side the actual indication they were taking the drug for in the trial. It just happens to be a positive side effect vs the usual negative side effect.

Not that I like to quibble about semantics. Usually that's the bashers job when trying to complain about NPs "10 million dollar salary" which as they pointed out are now the underwater options he received. That would mean his salary has gone down considerably, but that seems to be overlooked or not mentioned. Data can be spun in so so many ways.

Happy Thanksgiving and thanks for modding the board.