Toxic investor opinion. A few people asked me about the toxic investors disappearing in the third quarter, where are their shares? So here is my take for what it is worth.
We know:
Doc, as of the END of the third quarter, September 30th, 2021 did not own any of the toxic shares. His shares actually dropped by over 97 million shares, as has already been pointed out.
We also know the 5% rule, form 144 rule and officer, director rules (more later).
We know all 3 toxic investors owned more than 5% of the OUTSTANDING shares, right from the financials, for those who didn't read.the financials. The 5% rule required them to be listed in the financials.
Also the float is the same, telling us that the shares were not sold into the open market, which would have required a form 144 to sell restricted stock into the open market. So the shares are still privately held and held in blocks under 5%.
The sale of the toxic shares was private, so no rule 144 filed as the shares did not go into the float. Still with me here?
So here is what happened, IMO. The 904,371,113 toxic shares had to be broken up into blocks NO LARGER than 113,951,176 (5% of the OS shares). We also know no officer or director of Univec, Inc. bought even one share as they have to disclose every share they own even just one share. We also know that no one bought more than the 5% because they would have to be listed on the same page as Doc' holdings. So it took at least 8 individuals to make the purchase, but it could have been broken into smaller blocks, more people but no big deal.
Those 8 or more people are not officers or directors, just outsiders, with money as the shares cost .07 to .085 each. So who might they be?
For those that don't like speculating on DD stop reading here.
Now for some fun speculation. Interesting DD on Kizmet and the timing. You can bet the Kizmet partners are millionaires. Doc is an advisor to Kizmet. Did Doc get them to each personally buy into Univec, Inc. by picking up some of those toxic shares? They could buy a significant amount of shares, up to the 5% rule and not move the market even one 'tic' as it would have been a private transaction and no disclosure. Try to buy even 25 million shares and not move the market, much less 113,000,000 shares each (assuming they bought the maximum). You have to admit, an interesting speculation. A step further yet, they, Kizmet, advise very rich people and "private offices" (the super rich) and those people can buy what ever they want, they don't have a 'prospectus' to adhere to, like a mutual fund has to do, lol. Yes, just fun speculation. But the following is not speculation.
Folks, if you are not getting excited about Kizmet, you need to watch their video, two or thee or four times, until it sinks into your thick skull, lol. Come on give me a break it is late. Seriously watch it. Doc is rubbing elbows with some VERY big, connected hitters. Doc is an advisor to them for their health care ETF, look at their website. If you don't think this is big, watch the video again.
Sorry for the long post, hope it was helpful.
We know:
Doc, as of the END of the third quarter, September 30th, 2021 did not own any of the toxic shares. His shares actually dropped by over 97 million shares, as has already been pointed out.
We also know the 5% rule, form 144 rule and officer, director rules (more later).
We know all 3 toxic investors owned more than 5% of the OUTSTANDING shares, right from the financials, for those who didn't read.the financials. The 5% rule required them to be listed in the financials.
Also the float is the same, telling us that the shares were not sold into the open market, which would have required a form 144 to sell restricted stock into the open market. So the shares are still privately held and held in blocks under 5%.
The sale of the toxic shares was private, so no rule 144 filed as the shares did not go into the float. Still with me here?
So here is what happened, IMO. The 904,371,113 toxic shares had to be broken up into blocks NO LARGER than 113,951,176 (5% of the OS shares). We also know no officer or director of Univec, Inc. bought even one share as they have to disclose every share they own even just one share. We also know that no one bought more than the 5% because they would have to be listed on the same page as Doc' holdings. So it took at least 8 individuals to make the purchase, but it could have been broken into smaller blocks, more people but no big deal.
Those 8 or more people are not officers or directors, just outsiders, with money as the shares cost .07 to .085 each. So who might they be?
For those that don't like speculating on DD stop reading here.
Now for some fun speculation. Interesting DD on Kizmet and the timing. You can bet the Kizmet partners are millionaires. Doc is an advisor to Kizmet. Did Doc get them to each personally buy into Univec, Inc. by picking up some of those toxic shares? They could buy a significant amount of shares, up to the 5% rule and not move the market even one 'tic' as it would have been a private transaction and no disclosure. Try to buy even 25 million shares and not move the market, much less 113,000,000 shares each (assuming they bought the maximum). You have to admit, an interesting speculation. A step further yet, they, Kizmet, advise very rich people and "private offices" (the super rich) and those people can buy what ever they want, they don't have a 'prospectus' to adhere to, like a mutual fund has to do, lol. Yes, just fun speculation. But the following is not speculation.
Folks, if you are not getting excited about Kizmet, you need to watch their video, two or thee or four times, until it sinks into your thick skull, lol. Come on give me a break it is late. Seriously watch it. Doc is rubbing elbows with some VERY big, connected hitters. Doc is an advisor to them for their health care ETF, look at their website. If you don't think this is big, watch the video again.
Sorry for the long post, hope it was helpful.
25
