I gotta say they're some very interesting things going on in the OTC now.
I'm sharing this article to prove a point so any doubters who have their heads up their asses can understand the stakes. I do not need your validation nor require it but I sure will protect my damn Property and fight the good fight to the best of my ability. (God - Country- Family)
It has been censored by google so I had to use duckduckgo to find it. This article was written by Duke University Law Affiliates that connect to Hong Kong and Goldman Sachs.
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/djcil/vol31/iss2/3/
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcont...text=djcil
The article gets very interesting around page 19 relating to regulatory tactics to enhance transparency, reduce risk in dual share structures, and corporate hijacking via SOE control (influence) over corporate officers and their voting rights. Please read the entire article. It is 49 pages but it's worth the read and will give you a strong perspective as to the threat we all face.
When conducting due diligence in the majority owner of CRGP via 2015 disclosures
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/fin...62/content
you will find an entity that links back to Hong Kong thru a series of trust funds. The imbalance of shares in CRGP and its exposure to financial markets certainly warranted a FINRA U3/H3 halt for the extensive interruption at the time when the dividend was issued.
I am seeing multiple companies using transparency tactics in accordance with FINRA rules and regulations, enhanced DTCC margin requirements, implementation of new technology, law enforcement surveillance, centralizing of Clearing processes thru exchanges, and litigation in State court's to protect individual property rights to counter any possible foreign interference in US companies that may pose a threat to the national security of the United States.
Examples:
Cor Clearing had litigation in 5 states and CRGP shareholders to this day are protected and own their rightful shares. Cor Clearing aquired Apex Clearing in 2012 then Axos Clearing acquired Cor Clearing after the CRGP divi litigation was resolved.
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/201210...ationships
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/201901...cquisition
Alpine Securities, who is notorious for citations via SEC enforcement notices for securities violations had its legal representation abide by new DTCC regulations here...
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nscc-2021-005...240442.pdf
Official Reference:
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/202...of-partial
An example of technology enhancing transparency:
PRPM recently issued a dividend via Crypto tokens. Its currently in process with FINRA approval. The kicker is that the tokens used to track each real shareholders (property) via each broker so they can identify which entities are bad actors.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=166690855
or how about CRGP new TA (Pacific Transfer communicating with its former TA (Signature Stock) to help identify fraud on PRPM
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=166667203
Doesn't Pacific Stock reside in Nevada and have offices in Canada too? Foreign Accounts?
https://pacificstocktransfer.com/about-us
Most important US Government entity that protects the financial national security of the United States
https://www.fincen.gov/about/mission
I am not going to post every single CRGP litigation filing which identifies Cor Clearing and its former officer cooperating with law enforcement to protect shareholders.
I am not going to post the Ihub list of shareholders vetted? by law enforcement to show ownership and bad characters via the Cor Clearing v Ihub litigation.
I am not going to post the SSM custodianship battle in State court that CRGP management won ( or legal guardian) continues to own.
I am not going to post the importance of Pacific Stock and a Super Lawyers' involvement. Why pay all those fee's? LOL!!!
I am not going to post the most recent PR to go pink current so a corporate action can continue its process to go private because they're so many fucked up tactics used to destroy our property and company.
How could CRGP conduct operations in the public market? Why would it...after all this information and more...especially its own history!
This is my conviction and I have a lot of evidence to back it up!!!
Don't ever get it twisted!!! Do your own DD but don't ever judge me for hurting your feelings or lack of understanding. I stay and remain committed to seeing this thru...and nothing will get in my way!
P.S.
It's relevant! Read between the damn lines!
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/201...s-election
$13
$CRGP
I'm sharing this article to prove a point so any doubters who have their heads up their asses can understand the stakes. I do not need your validation nor require it but I sure will protect my damn Property and fight the good fight to the best of my ability. (God - Country- Family)
It has been censored by google so I had to use duckduckgo to find it. This article was written by Duke University Law Affiliates that connect to Hong Kong and Goldman Sachs.
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/djcil/vol31/iss2/3/
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcont...text=djcil
The article gets very interesting around page 19 relating to regulatory tactics to enhance transparency, reduce risk in dual share structures, and corporate hijacking via SOE control (influence) over corporate officers and their voting rights. Please read the entire article. It is 49 pages but it's worth the read and will give you a strong perspective as to the threat we all face.
When conducting due diligence in the majority owner of CRGP via 2015 disclosures
Quote:Control Person (shareholders holding more than 10% of any class)
Name Shares Class Percentage Ownership
INDUSTRIAS CALISSIO SUR SA 102,250,000 A – Common 90.12%
RIO RHIN 22 201
COL CUAHUTEMOC
MEXICO DF MEXICO
Colosio Sembrano, Beneficial Owner
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/fin...62/content
you will find an entity that links back to Hong Kong thru a series of trust funds. The imbalance of shares in CRGP and its exposure to financial markets certainly warranted a FINRA U3/H3 halt for the extensive interruption at the time when the dividend was issued.
I am seeing multiple companies using transparency tactics in accordance with FINRA rules and regulations, enhanced DTCC margin requirements, implementation of new technology, law enforcement surveillance, centralizing of Clearing processes thru exchanges, and litigation in State court's to protect individual property rights to counter any possible foreign interference in US companies that may pose a threat to the national security of the United States.
Examples:
Cor Clearing had litigation in 5 states and CRGP shareholders to this day are protected and own their rightful shares. Cor Clearing aquired Apex Clearing in 2012 then Axos Clearing acquired Cor Clearing after the CRGP divi litigation was resolved.
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/201210...ationships
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/201901...cquisition
Alpine Securities, who is notorious for citations via SEC enforcement notices for securities violations had its legal representation abide by new DTCC regulations here...
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nscc-2021-005...240442.pdf
Official Reference:
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/202...of-partial
An example of technology enhancing transparency:
PRPM recently issued a dividend via Crypto tokens. Its currently in process with FINRA approval. The kicker is that the tokens used to track each real shareholders (property) via each broker so they can identify which entities are bad actors.
Quote:ourword Monday, 11/08/21 05:12:53 PM
Re: None 0
Post #
113677
of 113680
On the other hand, it is very good that PRPM and BDGR know their shareholders on the street, in what kind of accounts and in the hands of which brokers their shares are. Very interesting that they meet their real shareholders, directly, including those who have shares in international omnibus accounts (which brokers often use to manipulate and harm real shareholders and public companies).
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=166690855
or how about CRGP new TA (Pacific Transfer communicating with its former TA (Signature Stock) to help identify fraud on PRPM
Quote:Eddie Vakser Member Level Saturday, 11/06/21 12:03:45 AM
Re: Kool Aid Man post# 113578 0
Post #
113615
of 113615
OK, so I already addressed this issue several times before, however, here is one more try. Our Transfer Agent, to his credit for being very savvy and observant, noticed a pattern of several attempts by the "same" three or four individuals who submitted "Notarized" documents stating that they were replacing "current" C level officers. So, at Signature Transfer, he and his company manages many companies. I believe, that these people got either sloppy or arrogant, because they used the same "Fake" Notary Public people, and the same "formatted" documents. Our TA, on a hunch, and in his case tracking no less than 10 attempts to "highjack" companies the he serviced as a Transfer Agency, decided to call other TA's and compare notes. Very quickly, it became obvious that something was wrong, so he called SEC. In a way, then, HE became a whistle blower! At the end of the investigation, they tracked over 50 companies in various stages of being defrauded by these actors. Our TA services 3 of my companies, SUTI, BDGR and UITA. None of our companies were breached, because our TA WAS the guy who saw the attempt on our and many other companies. Now, I will say, that Miller, one of the bad actors, did fool the Registered Agent in Nevada, who allowed him access to SOS Nevada "corporate back office". However, that's as far as he got, because any corporate actions, and/or significant issuances such as shares issued to themselves, had to go through the TA, (Transfer Agent). So, not only did our TA saved the day and helped the SEC and FBI arrest these idiots, but I also believe that he helped to minimize the overall damage to ALL affected shareholders and their companies. So, as a final statement, UITA was never breached and the mere mention of UITA , I believe, is simply because Signature Transfer was instrumental in catching them.(FOR EXAMPLE: reading the court filings, the charges state many examples of various issuances of shares by these "criminals" to themselves or their affiliates, however, no such examples are presented when UITA was mentioned. Also, there are no changes in our filings showing these characters becoming officers or directors in UITA). However, in any case , we are NOT in any way connected to these "bad actors". No one in our "circles" of people and service providers were involved, so trying to somehow "allege" that just because an attempt to highjack UITA was made , and that somehow that incident makes our company suspect of any wrong doing is simply ridiculous, and on the face value is nothing but "fake news" and an attempt to disparage our good name and is a simple attack on our good character.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=166667203
Doesn't Pacific Stock reside in Nevada and have offices in Canada too? Foreign Accounts?
Quote:Issuers We Serve
United States
NYSE AMEX, Nasdaq, OTC Markets, Pre-IPO, Community Banks, REITs, LPs, Mutual Funds
Canada
TSX Venture, CSE, OTC Markets, Dual Listings,NEO, Pre-IPO, Capital Pool Companies
https://pacificstocktransfer.com/about-us
Most important US Government entity that protects the financial national security of the United States
https://www.fincen.gov/about/mission
I am not going to post every single CRGP litigation filing which identifies Cor Clearing and its former officer cooperating with law enforcement to protect shareholders.
I am not going to post the Ihub list of shareholders vetted? by law enforcement to show ownership and bad characters via the Cor Clearing v Ihub litigation.
I am not going to post the SSM custodianship battle in State court that CRGP management won ( or legal guardian) continues to own.
I am not going to post the importance of Pacific Stock and a Super Lawyers' involvement. Why pay all those fee's? LOL!!!
I am not going to post the most recent PR to go pink current so a corporate action can continue its process to go private because they're so many fucked up tactics used to destroy our property and company.
How could CRGP conduct operations in the public market? Why would it...after all this information and more...especially its own history!
This is my conviction and I have a lot of evidence to back it up!!!
Don't ever get it twisted!!! Do your own DD but don't ever judge me for hurting your feelings or lack of understanding. I stay and remain committed to seeing this thru...and nothing will get in my way!
P.S.
It's relevant! Read between the damn lines!
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/201...s-election
$13
$CRGP
4
Calissio Resources Group, Inc. (CRGP) Stock Research Links
U.S. Constitution
"The Preamble
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Oath
"I solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America"
The Flag
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
"The Preamble
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Oath
"I solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America"
The Flag
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
Quote:If the broker-dealer fails to deliver for 13 days, the regulation imposes a “close out” duty to purchase and deliver securities “of like kind and quantity.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/20...ify%20wall
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/m...v-manning/
