Interesting post #2 gitreal Member Level Tu
Post# of 2067
(Total Views: 362)
Posted On: 10/26/2021 1:34:30 AM
Interesting post #2
gitreal Member Level Tuesday, 10/26/21 12:31:00 AM
Re: 8thaero post# 43116 0
Post # of 43119
I've had zero contact since Oct 8 2019 other than to ask office last year if a R Johnson is a known investor. Name not known which tells us something... or not and all good with me.
So, that's how Mexus operates? Not that it surprises me, but really? An investor contacts PT and/or Deb, asks questions about who other investors are...and gets an answer? Isn't that kind of stuff supposed to be confidential?
Again, not surprised. PT and Deb appear to have no idea how a publicly traded company is supposed to operate. Pure chickensh*t.
In addition to disclosing MATERIAL info about where carbon shipments are, where they went, where/why they got hung up......what else do the two big-mouths tell selected investors? Do they disclose when PRs are coming out and what they'll say? Do they disclose when the toxic lender will start dumping? Advance warning is always helpful, right?
gitreal Member Level Tuesday, 10/26/21 12:31:00 AM
Re: 8thaero post# 43116 0
Post # of 43119
I've had zero contact since Oct 8 2019 other than to ask office last year if a R Johnson is a known investor. Name not known which tells us something... or not and all good with me.
So, that's how Mexus operates? Not that it surprises me, but really? An investor contacts PT and/or Deb, asks questions about who other investors are...and gets an answer? Isn't that kind of stuff supposed to be confidential?
Again, not surprised. PT and Deb appear to have no idea how a publicly traded company is supposed to operate. Pure chickensh*t.
In addition to disclosing MATERIAL info about where carbon shipments are, where they went, where/why they got hung up......what else do the two big-mouths tell selected investors? Do they disclose when PRs are coming out and what they'll say? Do they disclose when the toxic lender will start dumping? Advance warning is always helpful, right?
(2)
(0)