So let's look at this from a different perspective
Post# of 148049
Why do you think NP was directly or indirectly at "fault" for any of these three that you've listed below? Please don't say it's because he's the CEO and the buck stops with him. I'm looking for examples of what NP should have done differently, because as I recall, he wasn't sitting back and not involved with pushing these forward and doing everything he could as the CEO.
Quote:
Hey Kevin. I agree with what you're saying, but I am noticing a pattern lately too.
1. "CD10 and CD12 failing wasn't NP's fault, it was the FDA!"
2. "The BLA not being filed wasn't NP's fault, it was Amarex!"
3. "CD16 enrolling slowly isn't NP's fault, it's BIOMM!"
BTW - there's a difference between being "responsible" and at "fault".