Quote: Goose, I like you man, I do...but you'd
Post# of 154662
(Total Views: 502)
Posted On: 10/18/2021 1:52:13 PM
Re: craigakess #107998
Quote:
Goose, I like you man, I do...but you'd vote "YES" if NP said he needed to kill you to wear your skin and sell your children into slavery for CYDY.
You went dark for even you Craig. A silence of the Lambs Buffalo Bill scenario? I don’ t know man… that’s way dark even for you as a Hollywood attorney.
It’s not about loyalty to Nader. It’s about insuring that we have the finances to accomplish the trials and start a couple more like Long Haulers. I don’t what to have “what if’s” to ponder and wonder if our company can stay solvent. To VOTE YES is to absolutely know we can and not wonder if we can.
This VOTE of YES makes sure and guarantees that we can purchase more Leronlimab and not be limited by secondary financing and possible chances at bankruptcy. I have Invested in Cytodyn for 2 years although not as long as some but the last thing I want to see is our company fail because we have a poor financing strategy or something changes that could cripple us. It’s never good to EXPECT financing when we are a non revenue company. Although we are getting small revenue from the Philippines. Having those 200m shares VOTED YES on… is the difference of knowing we will not go bankrupt. But more importantly knowing that we will be able to be financially secure in our trials and our immediate future purchase of more Leronlimab. Planning is everything.
The other huge issue could also be a deposit for more batches in 2022. Wouldn’t it be a bitch if we get all these approvals and can’t make enough Leronlimab to sell? This is our chance to see us flourish. Advanced planning will pay off I believe. Securing more batches will be huge. Would we have the same chances with financing? I don’t think so. VOTING YES is our best path.
Besides… I have watched our management take due care with their dilution of our stock. Maybe revenue comes before we use much of the shares we VOTE YES for? In that case we don’t use the shares. It’s entirely possible we don’t have to use them or maybe only 1/4 of them… but in my view it is money we can count on. We need to be able to count on our investment to stay solvent when we have forces trying to limit us.
So just VOTE YES… you know deep down it’s our best chance at guaranteeing survival and success in the same breath.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/605...z79fRSHiML
Goose, I like you man, I do...but you'd vote "YES" if NP said he needed to kill you to wear your skin and sell your children into slavery for CYDY.
You went dark for even you Craig. A silence of the Lambs Buffalo Bill scenario? I don’ t know man… that’s way dark even for you as a Hollywood attorney.
It’s not about loyalty to Nader. It’s about insuring that we have the finances to accomplish the trials and start a couple more like Long Haulers. I don’t what to have “what if’s” to ponder and wonder if our company can stay solvent. To VOTE YES is to absolutely know we can and not wonder if we can.
This VOTE of YES makes sure and guarantees that we can purchase more Leronlimab and not be limited by secondary financing and possible chances at bankruptcy. I have Invested in Cytodyn for 2 years although not as long as some but the last thing I want to see is our company fail because we have a poor financing strategy or something changes that could cripple us. It’s never good to EXPECT financing when we are a non revenue company. Although we are getting small revenue from the Philippines. Having those 200m shares VOTED YES on… is the difference of knowing we will not go bankrupt. But more importantly knowing that we will be able to be financially secure in our trials and our immediate future purchase of more Leronlimab. Planning is everything.
The other huge issue could also be a deposit for more batches in 2022. Wouldn’t it be a bitch if we get all these approvals and can’t make enough Leronlimab to sell? This is our chance to see us flourish. Advanced planning will pay off I believe. Securing more batches will be huge. Would we have the same chances with financing? I don’t think so. VOTING YES is our best path.
Besides… I have watched our management take due care with their dilution of our stock. Maybe revenue comes before we use much of the shares we VOTE YES for? In that case we don’t use the shares. It’s entirely possible we don’t have to use them or maybe only 1/4 of them… but in my view it is money we can count on. We need to be able to count on our investment to stay solvent when we have forces trying to limit us.
So just VOTE YES… you know deep down it’s our best chance at guaranteeing survival and success in the same breath.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/605...z79fRSHiML
(12)
(0)