SFRX and their partners have been on an “alleged
Post# of 7795
(Total Views: 270)
Posted On: 10/12/2021 6:16:19 PM
Re: Coat Tail Rider #6436
SFRX and their partners have been on an “alleged” wreck(s) they can’t ID since 2000 at Melbourne.
None of the mag surveys submitted to the Bureau suggest a large section of a wreck is there. Few artifacts have been found and many of the mag hits are modern metals, and they have no Recovery Permit.
This self-proclaimed industry leading recovery process hasn’t produced squat, and now you’re suggesting the $4B in treasure won’t be enough to positively ID the Concepcion?
Amusing.
The Timmy Toy couldn’t tell us what the “alleged” non ferrous targets are after we’ve been told since it was the Torres Toy that it could.
If it worked we wouldn’t be told it does, it would be demonstrated.
None of the mag surveys submitted to the Bureau suggest a large section of a wreck is there. Few artifacts have been found and many of the mag hits are modern metals, and they have no Recovery Permit.
This self-proclaimed industry leading recovery process hasn’t produced squat, and now you’re suggesting the $4B in treasure won’t be enough to positively ID the Concepcion?
Amusing.
The Timmy Toy couldn’t tell us what the “alleged” non ferrous targets are after we’ve been told since it was the Torres Toy that it could.
If it worked we wouldn’t be told it does, it would be demonstrated.
(0)
(0)Seafarer Exploration (SFRX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼