Was giving this a bit of thought...
The latest report shows Verb has 4,815,712
https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks...t-interest
It's almost identical to the previous report two week earlier
Tells me one of two things. Either that just happens to be a whole new set of shorters and the last ones covered which is highly unlikely or it's the same gang.
Wouldn't that be fun if it was? Now if they sold at say $2.30 why wouldn't they cover and avoid potential catastrophe of having to cover at say $5 'shortly'?
Naw, I think it may be they sold at a lower price and the price went up and they are Verb 'stuck shorts".
Wouldn't that make sense? It would explain why people deny there are shorts or many shorts since the beginning of time. First rule of 'stuck short' club is you don't talk about 'stunky short' club. Second rule of 'stinkie short' club is you get on a message board and lie your head off or do what every you have to, to get the share price down so you can cover.
Oh and the days to cover have doubled now to 3.
Bet with the right news, it may actually take an hour if Verb starts to run as what is the alternative?
With Verb's 67.6M OS and a float a bit smaller, what does that 5M shares actually look like?
Well lets imagine 1/2 the shares are sitting with Verb insiders, institutions and longs. You know the kind of long that isn't selling at $4.
I think it actually may be 2/3 sitting with Verb insiders, institutions and longs
Let's say 3 gazinta 65M a little over 20M
5 gazinta 20M, 4 times
4 gazinta100 25 times
I reckon 25% of the freely traded shares are short. If so, that explains all the LOL, LMFAO and dozen of daily panicky posts. No wonder why they pretend shorts don't exist.
tiktok, let's rock!
The latest report shows Verb has 4,815,712
https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks...t-interest
It's almost identical to the previous report two week earlier
Tells me one of two things. Either that just happens to be a whole new set of shorters and the last ones covered which is highly unlikely or it's the same gang.
Wouldn't that be fun if it was? Now if they sold at say $2.30 why wouldn't they cover and avoid potential catastrophe of having to cover at say $5 'shortly'?
Naw, I think it may be they sold at a lower price and the price went up and they are Verb 'stuck shorts".
Wouldn't that make sense? It would explain why people deny there are shorts or many shorts since the beginning of time. First rule of 'stuck short' club is you don't talk about 'stunky short' club. Second rule of 'stinkie short' club is you get on a message board and lie your head off or do what every you have to, to get the share price down so you can cover.
Oh and the days to cover have doubled now to 3.
Bet with the right news, it may actually take an hour if Verb starts to run as what is the alternative?
With Verb's 67.6M OS and a float a bit smaller, what does that 5M shares actually look like?
Well lets imagine 1/2 the shares are sitting with Verb insiders, institutions and longs. You know the kind of long that isn't selling at $4.
I think it actually may be 2/3 sitting with Verb insiders, institutions and longs
Let's say 3 gazinta 65M a little over 20M
5 gazinta 20M, 4 times
4 gazinta100 25 times
I reckon 25% of the freely traded shares are short. If so, that explains all the LOL, LMFAO and dozen of daily panicky posts. No wonder why they pretend shorts don't exist.
tiktok, let's rock!
16
