They say LH’ers because they really don’t have
Post# of 154516
(Total Views: 616)
Posted On: 10/03/2021 9:49:02 AM
They say LH’ers because they really don’t have a clue as to what is going on. Stroking Dr Patent stealer because people want to portray him as the expert in LH’ers. When the FDA didn’t pay attention to him on the 4 dose trial we wanted in the CD-12 trial. Dr JL wanted that 4 dose protocol and begged for it. Dr Patent stealer had no impact with the FDA as our paid consultant and sitting in on the Zoom meetings. He was basically useless to us in trial design and the FDA must of thought he was out of line in his beliefs because they disregarded our requests and the self proclaimed LH’ers expert didn’t have one bit of influence. They must of thought he was arrogant like many do. Sometime arrogance rubs people the wrong way and that is my contention of what happened with Dr. Patent stealer. Does the FDA even like him?
To dismiss the Brazil trials is total blindness to what would be most likely quickest to and our first approvals. Just understanding the difference from these trials from our last trials tells you that we have made changes to our trials and provided primary endpoints that are achievable. Mainly because we have already achieved these endpoints or corrected the reason we have not. These are the results of learning from our previous CD-10 & CD-12 trials.
The 13d group would possibly stop all trials and just focus on one trial at a time. This is what they started to promote when they first started this proxy group and I have not heard anything to change that projection of how they will deal with our current trials. Will they continue the trials or stop them and focus on just Long Haulers. Are they still that arrogant?
I like that we are tackling multiple super huge block busters indications at the same time. We have multiple shots on goal as they say. Having all your eggs in one basket isn’t good business or good foresight for any business. Betting on Dr. Patent stealer isn’t something we should bet on when his immediate past has been so questionable. I have no trust in this self enrichment motivated group to help our company. If you see it differently… you can’t be paying close enough attention to what is going on. We are better off with our current management team. Our current managements business plan is far superior to the 13d groups remedial plan of pulling back and stopping all trials. Who is that stupid? That’s the real question. How can anyone follow the 13d group when they have offered us nothing in comparison to our current business plan.
All this should be decided in 3 more days when the judge rules they are not even on the ballot. Bylaws are laws to a judge. The judge should will rule by the bylaws.
To dismiss the Brazil trials is total blindness to what would be most likely quickest to and our first approvals. Just understanding the difference from these trials from our last trials tells you that we have made changes to our trials and provided primary endpoints that are achievable. Mainly because we have already achieved these endpoints or corrected the reason we have not. These are the results of learning from our previous CD-10 & CD-12 trials.
The 13d group would possibly stop all trials and just focus on one trial at a time. This is what they started to promote when they first started this proxy group and I have not heard anything to change that projection of how they will deal with our current trials. Will they continue the trials or stop them and focus on just Long Haulers. Are they still that arrogant?
I like that we are tackling multiple super huge block busters indications at the same time. We have multiple shots on goal as they say. Having all your eggs in one basket isn’t good business or good foresight for any business. Betting on Dr. Patent stealer isn’t something we should bet on when his immediate past has been so questionable. I have no trust in this self enrichment motivated group to help our company. If you see it differently… you can’t be paying close enough attention to what is going on. We are better off with our current management team. Our current managements business plan is far superior to the 13d groups remedial plan of pulling back and stopping all trials. Who is that stupid? That’s the real question. How can anyone follow the 13d group when they have offered us nothing in comparison to our current business plan.
All this should be decided in 3 more days when the judge rules they are not even on the ballot. Bylaws are laws to a judge. The judge should will rule by the bylaws.
(10)
(0)