There is a huge difference in what you would call
Post# of 154182
(Total Views: 464)
Posted On: 09/28/2021 4:17:41 PM
Re: craigakess #105951
There is a huge difference in what you would call red flags. Your words were they are learning on the job. I agree that we have learned things as we have gone forward and we are the better for it. You must remember 20/20 hindsight is what they have been judged on. Our management didn’t bash the FDA or any competitor company and only praised both. This shows class and respect which I admire.
Nader May walk the line of speculation but what he tells you he believes and it truly is speculation. Of coarse as a lawyer like you are you know all to well what that disclosure statement at the beginning of every CC or webcast tells you the liability is still there and future speculation is just that…
I don’t believe Nader out right lies to us. I believe he is just the opposite of you in a hopeful optimist. Nader and I share this hopeful optimist. He is terrible at setting timelines and I won’t hate him for it but others do. I don’t take timelines as a matter of fact after he missed his first one. I believe in living and learning who you might listen to and judge what you can gather from that person. Does this person always show up late? Or does this person never make a deadline? These observations won’t continue to upset me when I realize they are not accurate in timelines. The saying come to mind… I take it with a grain of salt. I don’t expect this person to be accurate anymore. I don’t call their lack of making a timeline lying to me as some have.
So the big difference to me is bashing is disrespectful and not acceptable to me especially when they are half truths and out right lies. You don’t build trust with me when you lie at other expense. Then to continue to hammer relentlessly over and over and don’t really even believe what your pushing just to keep a negative campaign going just doesn’t make sense to a optimist. It disgusts me. I would venture to say that most investors hope for Leronlimab are optimistic for Leronlimab. Maybe not a full out optimist like me but a partial gambling investor and believe the science and has done the proper D&D.
My hope is they are not wearing blinders when watching the 13d group present their thinly veiled ideas that lack priorities and proper business sense. They clearly are off base with a future of our company and that is very suspect. So much so that most believe they are here to sell us out for pennies. Now why would we believe that? Maybe no plan or future direction or promises of anything more than a year out. Kind of gives you that warm and fuzzy feeling that you don’t get from this group.
I do receive that feeling from our current management because that was their mission statement at last years stockholders meeting. Do you remember? We will be come our own pharmaceutical company. This is a future to get behind. This is the best case scenario for our investment. But maybe you think it’s worth the risk to be sold to big Pharma and can allow the 13d your votes. Myself… I am smarter than that and have no trust with them. They haven’t earned any and have only lied to me. Hence the trust issue.
Nader May walk the line of speculation but what he tells you he believes and it truly is speculation. Of coarse as a lawyer like you are you know all to well what that disclosure statement at the beginning of every CC or webcast tells you the liability is still there and future speculation is just that…
I don’t believe Nader out right lies to us. I believe he is just the opposite of you in a hopeful optimist. Nader and I share this hopeful optimist. He is terrible at setting timelines and I won’t hate him for it but others do. I don’t take timelines as a matter of fact after he missed his first one. I believe in living and learning who you might listen to and judge what you can gather from that person. Does this person always show up late? Or does this person never make a deadline? These observations won’t continue to upset me when I realize they are not accurate in timelines. The saying come to mind… I take it with a grain of salt. I don’t expect this person to be accurate anymore. I don’t call their lack of making a timeline lying to me as some have.
So the big difference to me is bashing is disrespectful and not acceptable to me especially when they are half truths and out right lies. You don’t build trust with me when you lie at other expense. Then to continue to hammer relentlessly over and over and don’t really even believe what your pushing just to keep a negative campaign going just doesn’t make sense to a optimist. It disgusts me. I would venture to say that most investors hope for Leronlimab are optimistic for Leronlimab. Maybe not a full out optimist like me but a partial gambling investor and believe the science and has done the proper D&D.
My hope is they are not wearing blinders when watching the 13d group present their thinly veiled ideas that lack priorities and proper business sense. They clearly are off base with a future of our company and that is very suspect. So much so that most believe they are here to sell us out for pennies. Now why would we believe that? Maybe no plan or future direction or promises of anything more than a year out. Kind of gives you that warm and fuzzy feeling that you don’t get from this group.
I do receive that feeling from our current management because that was their mission statement at last years stockholders meeting. Do you remember? We will be come our own pharmaceutical company. This is a future to get behind. This is the best case scenario for our investment. But maybe you think it’s worth the risk to be sold to big Pharma and can allow the 13d your votes. Myself… I am smarter than that and have no trust with them. They haven’t earned any and have only lied to me. Hence the trust issue.
(6)
(0)