I completely disagree with many of those premises.

I completely disagree with many of those premises.

The unvaccinated provide the POOL from which the virus evolves.

Because instead of dying quickly as they would have in the past, the unvaccinated are kept alive for months, and the virus evolves. We KNOW for a fact that one of the really virulent mutations was found in an immune-suppressed patient who was on a ventilator for 2 months, did not die, but was still shedding virus for many months after she was released from the hospital. She was infected with the original form, but genetic testing showed that what she was shedding was a mutation. (sorry, I don't remember if it was Delta or one of the others)

If everyone had gotten vaccinated, the pool of those available to get infected for long periods of time and help create mutations would be vastly smaller.

Would anyone say that we should just let polio run its course ? How about smallpox? Both of these are great public health successes -- because of MASS VACCINATION.

There is a huge need for Leronlimab and anti-viral drugs now in development. There always will be. But vaccines are a big part of the solution, they are NOT contributing to the problem.

Look at past history to see exactly how this has worked in history. We have a United States rather than a colony of Great Britain, because George Washington insisted that the troops get vaccinated -- and it was immeasurably more dangerous with the crude technology they had back then.