Are you a litigation lawyer? Those are the one t

Are you a litigation lawyer? Those are the one that can make a better judgment. (neither am I ) Here is wild west. Dog eats dog type of thing. When there is money all these shrouds show up.(and not the most normal and sincere people like Recknor)

We know Nader & Co doesn't want to screw us. They only have a problem known an principal-agent problem( a well know and expected issue with any corps). They have the team of expertise as well.

We know Patterson & Co wants to sell Incelldx and screw us. Some of us are not as experienced in seeing through people, connectting the dots, judging people based on their past performance and keep telling ourselves:
- what if they don't what to screw us this time.
- what if they don't want to cut the value to half by selling Incelldx.
- what if they have a real plan that is better than the current mgmt.

We should always remember always lower your risk and dont take unnecessary RISKs.

a) Risk of EUA approval and sales. I think Nader & Co is way ahead of Patterson & Co.

b) Risk of endangering and screw owners of the corp (shareholders).
b1) Both parties have principal-agent issue ( a general issue with all corp around the world) and it is not considered an issue when we tie their work is tied bonus.
b2) Nader & Co. is not going to buy the bloated Incelldx,either.
b3) Nader & Co. is definitely looking to increase value of shareholders. He has not done an RS at all, when every single other CEO would have done so in 2019.
b4) Patterson & Co. said they will change owners with 13d cost of many millions.
b5) Patterson & Co. said they need to dilute significantly.
b6) Patterson & Co. will pass the burden of moving offices and contact od 10s of millions on owners.
b7) Patterson & Co. and looking of the intwrest of Incelldx shareholders and based on numbers very willing to take up to 50% of Cytodyn to acquire what I call a liability (for owners high potential income corp)
b8) Patterson & Co. have lie repeatedly and showed up right when there is smell of money. Looks like shrouds.
b9)...


Based on a and b risks. Nader & Co. is clearly a winner.

I don't want.to go on here, just because I do have business degree. But if you do have time just read through the basics of "Game Theory" and Nash equilibrium. What I did demonstrate in simple terms above what the basics of simultaneous move games and how to make the correct decisions.. I hope you'd have time to check the basics. (Someone told me once the movie called "Beautiful Minds", which I haven't seen, was based on Nash - probably that can help too)

Nevertheless remember rich people only bought premium stocks and not blue chips. Poor people make bad decisions by taking any risks.

Make the right decision. Assess the risks. Go with lower risks.

GLTA.