NO ONE said anything about a settlement. Read it c

Quote:

---

NO ONE said anything about a settlement. Read it carefully and understand...it clearly says JOINT STIPULATION to dismiss, which means that both sides agreed to dismiss it.

---

For a lawyer you don't seem to know what's up. I guess yammering with other attorneys about best terms for performer contracts doesn't give you much experience in the real world.

The joint stipulation occurred because the 13d folded like a cheap suit and published facts they were trying to hide (a settlement). Once the main basis for the lawsuit was cured there was no longer any reason for it. Cytodyn lost nothing, the 13d lost the ability to obscure some facts that they didn't want shareholders to know.

Quote:

---

And FYI, it does not say "dismissed with prejudice" which means that 13d can file again and file better if they so choose.

---

The 13d didn't file the federal lawsuit, Cytodyn did. So without prejudice pertains to the ability of Cytodyn to refile not the 13d.