This might, subject to other objections, be admissible as circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence is valid evidence in court. However, it might be improper expert opinion, but I am not going to go through the analysis here either way, because:
In any event, we are not in a court of law, we are before the FDA, who has their own rules requiring double blinded studies and p-values.
And,...
Quote:...that's the reason for Brazil.