I just have to say Craig… that optimist hat you use to wear once in a great while… You must of thrown it on the ground and stopped it until it cried for you to stop and then for good measure you stopped it again and again until you couldn’t tell it was even a hat.
You sir have been the pessimist of the board lately. You use to have that streak of show me the facts but now it’s all poo poo this and poo poo that.
As for Nader being the man. If everything goes as we would expect it to. Nader stays in charge and our first approval happens before April 2022. I would say that “Nader is our man” he brought us this funny MAB drug that we thought might be just for HIV and somehow it is the Jack of all trades for many diseases or so it seems. Nader having found it and pushed the narrative of what it can do and trialed it to a successful trial in HIV and possibly something even sooner in a possible covid EUA.
I ask you how you can’t see that it’s all Nader leading this miraculous drug to its first approval? Is there someone else that should be getting the majority of the credit? I know there is a management team and I take nothing away from the help that Nader has received. But Nader has been the chosen one to bring us this far and it looks more and more like he is the one to get us across the finish line. The 13d is timing out and failing in their bid as it looks currently.
Why… because the 13d doesn’t stand a chance with their “no plan” effort at BASHING their way into control of a drug that will make it to market with or without them. They have nothing to offer us. The 13d group would bring us nothing and only slow us down. Why would we trust such a shit show as they have been? It’s almost a joke that they still trying after their legal mess they presented in their initial filings. We are in court because they didn’t file open and honestly. Yet, they still believe they can capture our trust. What pipe are they hitting. It’s not tobacco. My opinions could go on and on about their worthlessness. Unless you would like to mention something I left out about that investor group? Something pertinent that might capture them a few votes that they could earn from say a pessimist?
You sir have been the pessimist of the board lately. You use to have that streak of show me the facts but now it’s all poo poo this and poo poo that.
As for Nader being the man. If everything goes as we would expect it to. Nader stays in charge and our first approval happens before April 2022. I would say that “Nader is our man” he brought us this funny MAB drug that we thought might be just for HIV and somehow it is the Jack of all trades for many diseases or so it seems. Nader having found it and pushed the narrative of what it can do and trialed it to a successful trial in HIV and possibly something even sooner in a possible covid EUA.
I ask you how you can’t see that it’s all Nader leading this miraculous drug to its first approval? Is there someone else that should be getting the majority of the credit? I know there is a management team and I take nothing away from the help that Nader has received. But Nader has been the chosen one to bring us this far and it looks more and more like he is the one to get us across the finish line. The 13d is timing out and failing in their bid as it looks currently.
Why… because the 13d doesn’t stand a chance with their “no plan” effort at BASHING their way into control of a drug that will make it to market with or without them. They have nothing to offer us. The 13d group would bring us nothing and only slow us down. Why would we trust such a shit show as they have been? It’s almost a joke that they still trying after their legal mess they presented in their initial filings. We are in court because they didn’t file open and honestly. Yet, they still believe they can capture our trust. What pipe are they hitting. It’s not tobacco. My opinions could go on and on about their worthlessness. Unless you would like to mention something I left out about that investor group? Something pertinent that might capture them a few votes that they could earn from say a pessimist?
10
1
