Hulk, I'm glad to hear that you live in the happy world where there is no such thing as corruption. I'm pleased to learn about this. It clears my mind.
Thank fortune the FDA did not act in an unethical way in the opioid crisis -- if they had, many thousands of Americans might have ended up addicted to opioids!
Also very glad the FDA didn't approve an Alzheimer's drug despite no evidence that it could work. Why would they do that? Of course they wouldn't.
Similarly, I'm almost ecstatic that the FDA's approval of Remdesivir and its EUA for hydroxychloroquine had no relation to any connections with drugmakers or political input. This is all very good news. Thanks for the correction.
So the lack of progress in HIV, that's all CYDY's fault, because it has been slow to complete its BLA. Okay. I am clearly wrong in thinking that the slowdown originated with some very strange behavior, when CYDY asked for approval at one dosage, and the FDA made them submit more data for a different dosage.
The FDA surely wouldn't care that big drugmakers might be losing a big market in HIV if CYDY is approved, because the FDA is completely independent of big drugmakers, even though it is partially sponsored by them.
It wouldn't make sense for the FDA to be funded by big pharma, because it is supposed to regulate big pharma. So that couldn't happen. Thank God!
As you wrote, "Find a 9 year old who believes that the world is a giant conspiracy...." Which is so correct, Hulk! Only a 9 year-old could believe that an alarming number of actions in very different situations undertaken by the FDA, actions which were all to the detriment of CYDY, could have any meaning. It's all on the company, for sure! All of us 9 year olds say the same.
Again, thanks. You've made me feel much better.
Thank fortune the FDA did not act in an unethical way in the opioid crisis -- if they had, many thousands of Americans might have ended up addicted to opioids!
Also very glad the FDA didn't approve an Alzheimer's drug despite no evidence that it could work. Why would they do that? Of course they wouldn't.
Similarly, I'm almost ecstatic that the FDA's approval of Remdesivir and its EUA for hydroxychloroquine had no relation to any connections with drugmakers or political input. This is all very good news. Thanks for the correction.
So the lack of progress in HIV, that's all CYDY's fault, because it has been slow to complete its BLA. Okay. I am clearly wrong in thinking that the slowdown originated with some very strange behavior, when CYDY asked for approval at one dosage, and the FDA made them submit more data for a different dosage.
The FDA surely wouldn't care that big drugmakers might be losing a big market in HIV if CYDY is approved, because the FDA is completely independent of big drugmakers, even though it is partially sponsored by them.
It wouldn't make sense for the FDA to be funded by big pharma, because it is supposed to regulate big pharma. So that couldn't happen. Thank God!
As you wrote, "Find a 9 year old who believes that the world is a giant conspiracy...." Which is so correct, Hulk! Only a 9 year-old could believe that an alarming number of actions in very different situations undertaken by the FDA, actions which were all to the detriment of CYDY, could have any meaning. It's all on the company, for sure! All of us 9 year olds say the same.
Again, thanks. You've made me feel much better.
27
