Your writing does not indicate you want QMC to suc
Post# of 22453
If and when Pasaca takes over, there is a difference between
1. Squires leading with Pasaca enabling him by supporting his goals
and
2, Pasaca taking over without Squires and breaking up the company,
with the shareholders getting nothing.
quote PV
And you haven't provided a way out that protects the shareholders without Steve in charge.
All you do is write negatively about Squires.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=622...z74W07IWZ8